I 'm not sure I understand but
firstly.. the 'fwd' keyword DOES NOT ALTER THE PACKET
so you need to have the same rule on 139.142.135.115
so that the incoming packet is captured there, whe it gets there,
as the headers still say that it's supposed to go somewhere else.
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001,
Ok one last question.. :)
I am trying to redirect all the traffic on a certain port except for a
couple of computers.. I have this rule setup to do this..
fwd 139.142.135.115 tcp from any to any 80
How would I then make it so that those couple of machines are not
effected.. I've tried the fol
I don't think increasing kern.ipc.maxsockbuffer to such a big
number is a good idea. You may want either reduce this value
or increase maximum number of mbufs by setting NMBCLUSTERS
in your kernel configuration file.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 10:07:26AM -0500, Joseph Lekostaj wrote:
> I've been t
Hmm.. I'm not sure which ones you want me to swap? I think the tabs are
getting messed up.. It looks like I should swap natd and from but that
can't be right?
Ahh there we go.. Swap the any and the 139 address.. That worked..
Thanks a lot you two! :)
Pete
On Tuesday, July 10, 2001, at 05:14
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Nick Rogness wrote:
> > You need to add another rule:
> >
> > ipfw add divert natd all from $PUBLIC_IP to any in via en0
> ^ ^
>
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Nick Rogness wrote:
> You need to add another rule:
>
> ipfw add divert natd all from $PUBLIC_IP to any in via en0
^ ^
\--/
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Peter Warrick wrote:
> I was referred to you by an Archie Cobbs who I guess did some of the
> ipfw code in FreeBSD? I have a question that I'm hoping someone over
> on your end might be able to help me with. I apologize if this email
> has reached the wrong person btw. :)
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 12:07:55AM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > Please cc me, as I'm not on this list.
> >
> > I am using 4.3-RELEASE, and investigating why I don't see
> > any keepalives (using tcpdump) on my connections.
> >
> > The default values are as follows:
> > net.inet.tcp.keepidle
You need to divert bith directions.
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Peter Warrick wrote:
> I was referred to you by an Archie Cobbs who I guess did some of the
> ipfw code in FreeBSD? I have a question that I'm hoping someone over on
> your end might be able to help me with. I apologize if this email has
I was referred to you by an Archie Cobbs who I guess did some of the
ipfw code in FreeBSD? I have a question that I'm hoping someone over on
your end might be able to help me with. I apologize if this email has
reached the wrong person btw. :)
I have setup a server with 2 NIC cards and have na
I'm having some problems with a couple of PCMCIA ethernet cards in
FreeBSD 4.3. First, a quick history of what I have done. I have 2 Vaio
laptop computers, a Cisco Aironet 340 series wireless card, and a LinkSys
10/100 PC Card (PCM100). I tested the LinkSys card in my laptop when I
firs
> -Original Message-
> From: Garrett Wollman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 July 2001 18:12
> To: Richard Smith
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: sysctls keepidle and keepintvl
>
>
> < <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Looking at the comments in tcp_var.h, it should be
> > keepin
Try restricting sendspace and recvspace to 256K. If you're adventurous, try
recompiling the kernel after bumping up the #define SB_MAX (in
/usr/src/sys/sys/socketvar.h) beyond the default value of 256*1024
-AG
-
I've been trying to up my TCP window size from the default 16K and it's caused
< said:
> Looking at the comments in tcp_var.h, it should be
> keepintvl that sets this interval. Otherwise, why
> have such a large value for keepidle?
FreeBSD contains a kluge wherein all TCP connections have a form of
keepalive enabled by default. This is supposed to be separate from
the ex
DNS problem?
==WWW.XGFORCE.COM The Next Generation Load
Balance and Fail Safe Server Clustering Softwarefor the
Internet.==
- Original Message -
From:
Cameron
Haegle
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: T
FreeBSDlover FreeBSDlover wrote:
>
> Can i setup configured tunneling between a router and host which are in the
> same network?If possible pls explain me.
Yes, for network and app-layer tunnels. Not sure for lower layers. What
are you setting up?
Lars
--
Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Title: RE: Help me to configure
Ok i've gotten like 4 of these in the last two days please stop.
Thanks,
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: FreeBSDlover FreeBSDlover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help me to configure
>Hi,
>Pls look at the following configuration.
>- -
>|| | |
>| R |-| H |
>|| | |
>- --
>R = 192.168.
I've been trying to up my TCP window size from the default 16K and it's caused nothing
but problems. From the info I've found so far, these are the sysctl i've changed:
kern.ipc.maxsockbuffer=2097152
net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=524288
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=524288
But if I do
Hi,
Pls look at the following configuration.
- -
|| | |
| R |-| H |
|| | |
- --
R = 192.168.3.1
Hi,
Pls look at the following configuration.
- -
|| | |
| R |-| H |
|| | |
- --
R = 192.168.3.1
They are auto generated by make depend I think.Should be in your kernel
build directory.
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Clement Trensz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to use some functions from the /sys/net/if.c file but a few
> files such as opt_inet6.h, opt_inet.H, opt_compat.h are #defined and I
> can't fin
Hi,
I'd like to use some functions from the /sys/net/if.c file but a few
files such as opt_inet6.h, opt_inet.H, opt_compat.h are #defined and I
can't find them on my machine. Does anybody know where I can get them?
Thanks,
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd
Before I dig too deep into the Sendmail
documentation I wanted to ensure that the following is possible.
My FreeBSD box is performing NATd and IPFW
functions for a few PCs at home, off of my cable modem. Wheneve I attempt to
send an e-mail from my system I receive a message back from indica
Can i setup configured tunneling between a router and host which are in the
same network?If possible pls explain me.
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
Hi there,
I have strange problem with natd and ICMP 3.4 (destination unreachable/
fragmentation needed) packets.
Situation:
- we have FreeBSD 4.2-20001228-STABLE box with ipfw and natd configured
xl0 interface have public address 195.168.x.x
xl1 interface is connected to our intranet
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:05:13PM +0100, Richard Smith wrote:
> Please cc me, as I'm not on this list.
>
> I am using 4.3-RELEASE, and investigating why I don't see
> any keepalives (using tcpdump) on my connections.
>
> The default values are as follows:
> net.inet.tcp.keepidle = 720
> -Original Message-
> From: Ruslan Ermilov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 July 2001 10:02
> To: Richard Smith
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: sysctls keepidle and keepintvl
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:05:13PM +0100, Richard Smith wrote:
> > Please cc me, as I'm not on
28 matches
Mail list logo
