IPSec/NAT single gateway?

Hey there, all you network gurus, I'm attempting to connect two office LANs over the Net with a VPN. I was originally looking at vpnd, but it appears that everything I need is available in the 4.3 kernel via IPsec. The two offices are running Windows (95, 98, & NT4) on the desktop and are conne

Re: ipv6 tools

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 05:55:57AM +0100, vishwanath pargaonkar wrote: > Hi, > i have 4.2 stable powepack CD ie 10 CDs. > does we have anything as ipv6 testing tool in those 10 > CDs. Only what's in the FreeBSD base system and ports collection anyway. Kris PGP signature

ipv6 tools

Hi, i have 4.2 stable powepack CD ie 10 CDs. does we have anything as ipv6 testing tool in those 10 CDs. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

rtmsg_input function of rtadvd daemon

Hi, My understanding of this function is like this. This function will receive input only when a)the routes are added through the route6 command. b) When a prefix is added through the prefix command. c) when a new address is formed from the prefix through the prefix received through router adver

ipf packet munging bug using "to" option in rule

>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator:Louis Mamakos >Organization: dept of serendipity scheduling and managment >Confidential: no >Synopsis: ipf packet munging bug using "to" option in rule >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Category: kern >Class: sw-bug >

Re: routing socket and routes assignment

Iasen Kostoff wrote: > The gateway is directly connected and I think this is obvious and should > not even be discused. The IP address of the gateway is not from > network that the computer is. But there is a route throu interface to it > and the kernel still refuses to use that gateway with erro

Re: TIP command

vishwanath pargaonkar([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.30 17:13:27 +: > Hi, > tell me how can i connect to remote system by using > tip command. > i have connected two machines by serial line. > i gave tip cuaa0c and it said connected.but how can i > make it to ask for user name. > what shd i enter

Re: why cannot bind to someipaddress:port when something else has *:port bound?

¡Hola! > See SO_REUSEADDR. Seen that. Don't believe it has something to do with that. Isn't it supposed to allow binding on a port where there is some other socket using that socket in TIME_WAIT ? > Barney Wolff HoraPe --- Horacio J. Peña [EMAIL PROTECTE

TIP command

Hi, tell me how can i connect to remote system by using tip command. i have connected two machines by serial line. i gave tip cuaa0c and it said connected.but how can i make it to ask for user name. what shd i enter in /etc/remote.shd i enter remote system name? pls tell me details abt connectin

Re: why cannot bind to someipaddress:port when something else has *:port bound?

See SO_REUSEADDR. Barney Wolff On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 07:41:42AM -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: > On Wed, 30 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > The following program binds *:1000 to a socket, and then tries to > > bind 200.47.36.254:1000 to another socket, the error i gets is > > "Address alr

mpd-netgraph as pptp server

hi, i just want to know that if in mpd.conf, i have this entry: pptp0: new -i ng0 pptp0 pptp0 set iface route default set iface disable on-demand set iface enable proxy-arp set iface idle 0 set bundle disable multilink set link yes acfcomp

Re: why cannot bind to someipaddress:port when something else has*:port bound?

On Wed, 30 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The following program binds *:1000 to a socket, and then tries to > bind 200.47.36.254:1000 to another socket, the error i gets is > "Address already in use". Why? *:1000 includes 200.47.36.254:1000 by definition of bind(2). Binding two sockets to o

Intel Etherexpress PILA

Hello! Can anyone explain to me what that PILA stands for, and if this card is compatible with the Intel Etherexpress PRO and thus allow VLAN tagging? kind regards, ferdinand To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

why cannot bind to someipaddress:port when something else has *:port bound?

¡Hola! The following program binds *:1000 to a socket, and then tries to bind 200.47.36.254:1000 to another socket, the error i gets is "Address already in use". Why? I am not asking for a "you're not allowed to do that", I know. I don't ask for a "why are you trying to do that?", I amn't trying

Netgraph node to support 802.1q VLANs ?

Hi all Does anybody manage to make netgraph node to do VLAN multiplexing ? Yes, I know, freebsd kernel have now supporting for VLAN's (pseudo-device vlan), but it have number of disadvantages: - fixed number of vlan interfaces - vlanX pseudo-interfaces don't support netgraph'ing, so I can't

Re: routing socket and routes assignment

On Tue, 29 May 2001, Jesper Skriver wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 02:28:51PM +0300, Iasen Kostoff wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a problem in assigning a default gateway from network that > > my computer's interfaces don't have IP from. > > All routes should have a next-hop on a directly co