hi,
i have a fbsd 4.3 box with natd acting as a router too. unfortunately i did
all the natd and ipfw stuff in my own rc.firewall script. but here my
suggestions:
- kernel options seems to be ok for natd
- in rc.conf remove the 'natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf"' line in NATD
section (or do you
On Saturday, May 26, 2001, at 07:59 PM, Brandt wrote:
> Well, I assumed the natd would be noticed in the subject line, and also
> it is listed under the "rc.conf" section I listed below.
I did indeed notice that you mentioned Natd, but without the
config, it's hard to tell whether you are actu
Well, I assumed the natd would be noticed in the subject line, and also
it is listed under the "rc.conf" section I listed below.
As for the dc0, I forgot I had tried a 255.255.0.0 subnet, and played
with the broadcast just for giggles. Normally they are 255.255.0.0
and 192.168.1.255 respectively
Your msg implies you're using NAT, but you've not included anything
about the NAT config. Also, the 'ifconfig' output for dc0 doesn't
jibe with the rest of your message.
Regards,
Justin
On Saturday, May 26, 2001, at 07:32 PM, Brandt wrote:
> Hello all, this has got me stumped.
>
> FreeBSD 4
Hello all, this has got me stumped.
FreeBSD 4.3
vr0: ip= 65.3.111.111 subnet 255.255.255.0
dc0: ip= 192.168.1.1 subnet 255.255.255.0
Kernel has been recompiled with IPDIVERT and IPFIREWALL options,
and every thing WORKS fine as long as I have both NIC's pluged into the
SAME hub.
But s
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 09:34:42PM +0200, Jesper Skriver wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently looking at ways to tune a ftp server, and when
> tuning net.inet.tcp.sendspace/net.inet.tcp.recvspace and
> NMBCLUSTERS, I came to think that in a ftp server role, half the
> TCP sessions will be control sessi
Harkirat Singh wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I want to measure UDP thruput of lossy channel, is there any tool
> which tests it? I looked at some of the tools but these do not take care
> of loss, I mean no retransmisson, just measure raw thruput of UDP (TTCP
> is one of these).
Matt Dillon has
Ah - NO. UDP and TCP were specifically DESIGNED for DIFFERENT
network conditions. Your making an apples-to-oranges comparison
here which isn't going to give you any useful information.
One kind of network condition will make TCP be horrible and UDP
be great - an other kind of condition will mak
On Saturday, May 26, 2001, at 12:52 PM, Harkirat Singh wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply, I looked at Netpref and that even I used for
> measuring thruput in case of TCP. I felt that instead of writing my own
> reliable application over UDP I would use some standard
> mesaurement tool.
>
> In Ne
Thanks for your reply, I looked at Netpref and that even I used for
measuring thruput in case of TCP. I felt that instead of writing my own
reliable application over UDP I would use some standard mesaurement tool.
In Netperf they have a option called "UDP_RR" UDP Request/Reply, will this
take ca
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 12:24:45PM -0700, Harkirat Singh wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2001, Josh Paetzel wrote:
>
> > On Saturday 26 May 2001 13:51, Harkirat Singh wrote:
> >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I want to measure UDP thruput of lossy channel, is there any
> > > tool which tests it? I looked at
On Saturday, May 26, 2001, at 12:24 PM, Harkirat Singh wrote:
>
> I specifically want to see the performance of UDP in lossy
> channel, I am
> sure there must be some tool to measure it, I doing a kind of study and
> want to analyse TCP vs. UDP!
If you want to measure the performance of these
Hi,
I'm currently looking at ways to tune a ftp server, and when
tuning net.inet.tcp.sendspace/net.inet.tcp.recvspace and
NMBCLUSTERS, I came to think that in a ftp server role, half the
TCP sessions will be control sessions, which doesn't transfer much
data, so there is no reason to reserve the
I am looking at performance of UDT and TCP in same network condition!!
-Harkirat
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Bill Moran wrote:
> Harkirat Singh wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > I want to measure UDP thruput of lossy channel, is there any tool
> > which tests it? I looked at some of the tools but
I specifically want to see the performance of UDP in lossy channel, I am
sure there must be some tool to measure it, I doing a kind of study and
want to analyse TCP vs. UDP!
-Harkirat
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> On Saturday 26 May 2001 13:51, Harkirat Singh wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
On Saturday 26 May 2001 13:51, Harkirat Singh wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I want to measure UDP thruput of lossy channel, is there any tool
> which tests it? I looked at some of the tools but these do not take care
> of loss, I mean no retransmisson, just measure raw thruput of UDP (TTCP
> is one of
Harkirat Singh wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I want to measure UDP thruput of lossy channel, is there any tool
> which tests it? I looked at some of the tools but these do not take care
> of loss, I mean no retransmisson, just measure raw thruput of UDP (TTCP
> is one of these).
>
> I am lookin
Hello!
I want to measure UDP thruput of lossy channel, is there any tool
which tests it? I looked at some of the tools but these do not take care
of loss, I mean no retransmisson, just measure raw thruput of UDP (TTCP
is one of these).
I am looking for a measurement tool which should re
>
> I tried you patch but still without luck. A listing of servers will
> show a server, then if you right click on it to login, it takes
> forever and all of the Windoze client hangs until finally the pop-up
> menu appears. If I then click "Login to server" it immediately knows
> that I cannot
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 12:16:02AM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> If it makes sense to be able to switch it on and off at run-time
> (e.g., it may make sense to, say, use it to compare resposne from
> something), you can make the sysctl conditional on the compile-time
> option. If Alfred just want
Actually, this patch was broken; the updated one is at:
http://www.freebsd.org/~kris/randomized-ipid.diff
Kris
PGP signature
21 matches
Mail list logo
