> i don't see a security issue in this, just want to ask if this is ok (or
> maybe unwanted?):
>
> in src/usr.sbin/arp/arp.c in function search() (starts line ~429) i see
> this (line ~447):
>
> if ((buf = malloc(needed)) == NULL)
>
> this allocated memory isn't free'd later in this func
> Should a tunnel endpoint show up in route advertisements sent from
> rip/gated/zebra running on the FreeBSD 4.3-Stable system?
Depends on if your routing protocol advertises over point-to-point links
(like gif interfaces). If so, you should see virtual interfaces being
advertised.
> My guess
>Earlier last week I wrote:
>> I just built and tested the latest KAME-SNAP, and it appears as if
>> the two ipsec tunnels work together now. I will have a final word
>> on this later tomorrow, but for now it looks as if this problem
>> requires no further action on your part.
>
>Unfortunately I
Earlier last week I wrote:
> I just built and tested the latest KAME-SNAP, and it appears as if
> the two ipsec tunnels work together now. I will have a final word
> on this later tomorrow, but for now it looks as if this problem
> requires no further action on your part.
Unfortunately I found ou
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, John Wilson wrote:
> > /-\
> > | router 90.91.92.1 |
> > \-/
> > |
> > |
> > /-\ /-\
> > | fxp0 90.91.92.2/30 |---| fxp1 90.91.92.?/? |
> > \-/
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:03:04 -0500 (CDT), Nick Rogness wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, John Wilson wrote:
> > This seems like a good solution. Please help me figure out the
> > subnets/routes I need to use. So far, I have this:
> >
> > /-\
> > | router 90.91.92.1
If memory serves me right, Harkirat Singh wrote:
> Thanks for your replies, I am able to install netperf manually. I
> understand from various replies that my port tree is old, though this port
> collection I got installed from new FBSd CD. Please tell me how to update
> this port tree so that in
hi there,
i don't see a security issue in this, just want to ask if this is ok (or
maybe unwanted?):
in src/usr.sbin/arp/arp.c in function search() (starts line ~429) i see
this (line ~447):
if ((buf = malloc(needed)) == NULL)
got from:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.
Thanks for your replies, I am able to install netperf manually. I
understand from various replies that my port tree is old, though this port
collection I got installed from new FBSd CD. Please tell me how to update
this port tree so that in future I do not face this silly problem, if I do
make un
If memory serves me right, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:29:05AM -0700, Harkirat Singh wrote:
> >=20
> > This is the script file!!. I said that I went to ftp site to see whether
> > it (netperf-2.1pl3) is supported for FreeBSD, but I saw all th eother OS
> > but there was no re
> > This is the script file!!. I said that I went to ftp site to see whether
> > it (netperf-2.1pl3) is supported for FreeBSD, but I saw all th eother OS
> > but there was no reference for FreeBSD.
>
> Ignore the f*ing ftp site. It looks like there's something wrong with
> your network configura
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:29:05AM -0700, Harkirat Singh wrote:
>
> This is the script file!!. I said that I went to ftp site to see whether
> it (netperf-2.1pl3) is supported for FreeBSD, but I saw all th eother OS
> but there was no reference for FreeBSD.
Ignore the f*ing ftp site. It looks l
This is the script file!!. I said that I went to ftp site to see whether
it (netperf-2.1pl3) is supported for FreeBSD, but I saw all th eother OS
but there was no reference for FreeBSD.
-Harkirat
Script started on Mon Apr 30 11:26:50 2001
penguin# make install clean
>> netper
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 10:55:48AM -0700, Harkirat Singh wrote:
> I understand that netperf-2.1p13 does'nt work with FreeBSD. Do you know
> any other version of netperf which works with FreeBSD.
It works just fine. I installed it on two machines a couple weeks ago.
You don't need to go to the ft
Hello Davis:
Before posting my original message I did try to install the
package using Make but this ftp site as mentioned in the makefile does'nt
support any package for FreeBSD.
Thsi is part of my makefile...
**
PORTNAME= netperf
PORTVERSION=2.1.3
CATEGORIES= be
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, John Wilson wrote:
>
> > > fxp1 is bound to several IPs, 192.168.1.254 and 192.168.2.254 for
> two > > different types of NAT clients, and 90.91.92.4 for the DMZ.
> >
> > Define "2 different types of NAT clients". Your DMZ is not on a
> > seperate network of your
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:50:16AM -0700, Harkirat Singh wrote:
> Then I thought that let me use Netperf, I went the ftp site as mentioned
> in the port's readme file but I found that there is no release for
> FreeBSD!! There is another tool called Tcpblast, but I had same
> problem with this als
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Marcel Lemmen wrote:
> Try setting the media to autoselect:
> ifconfig fxp1 netmask media auto
Yes it is working. Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Christophe.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Try setting the media to autoselect:
ifconfig fxp1 netmask media auto
Kind regards,
Marcel Lemmen
Support Net
--
| Marcel Lemmen | Support Net BV| |
| System Engineer | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Hi all,
I installed a Network Internet Card on a FreeBSD machine.
>From the ifconfig command, I have got "status: no carrier".
--
fxp1: flags=8843 mtu 1500
inet 194.207.253.2 netmask 0xfff8 broadcast 194.207.253.7
inet6 fe80::202:b3ff:fe13:e596%fxp1 prefixlen 64 scopeid
Hello!
I wanted to use TTCP for doing some of my lab experiments, (server
was running first), I was getting error message as "Connection Refused", I
am having 4.2-Release. Could someone tell me the cause for this and how to
debug it, I did not compile it, I am having just binaries (orig
21 matches
Mail list logo
