On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Peter Brezny wrote:
> The excerpt from my rc.conf mostly illustrates what I'm trying to do.
> I want to connect a host (10.30.1.15) to xl1 So that I can partition
> it's traffic from that of the lan connected to xl2.
>
> 10.30.1.1 GWxl0 10.30.1.30 FW xl210.20.30.
The excerpt from my rc.conf mostly illustrates what I'm trying to do. I
want to connect a host (10.30.1.15) to xl1 So that I can partition it's
traffic from that of the lan connected to xl2.
10.30.1.1 GWxl0 10.30.1.30 FW xl210.20.30.1 LAN
|
Shoichi,
I just built and tested the latest KAME-SNAP, and it appears as if
the two ipsec tunnels work together now. I will have a final word
on this later tomorrow, but for now it looks as if this problem
requires no further action on your part.
thank you so much for looking into this,
-Gunthe
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Nick Rogness wrote:
>
> Multi-Destination gif tunnel
>
> Anybody had any success at setting these things up? I have a couple of
> questions...maybe someone can answer:
Since noone answered the mail, I will post the solution in case
someone needs this info a
Shoichi Sakane wrote:
> I have tested, but I couldn't have any error. I made the following network.
> And I executed flooding ping to A from both B and C. All of hosts seemed
> quite stable. Of course, these ICMP packet were encapsulated by ESP.
>
> Actually, I couldn't prepare three FreeBSD
> > > sorry that we did not make any useful responses, some of the kame guys
> > > (mainly sakane) are trying to repeat the symptom.
> > I appreciate that very much!
>
> I have tested, but I couldn't have any error. I made the following network.
> And I executed flooding ping to A from both B an
man resolv.conf
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
> > sorry that we did not make any useful responses, some of the kame guys
> > (mainly sakane) are trying to repeat the symptom.
> I appreciate that very much!
I have tested, but I couldn't have any error. I made the following network.
And I executed flooding ping to A from both B and C. All of
I have two separate instances of named running on a system. One for
internal and one for external.
The dns appears to work fine. With nslookup, you can choose which ever
server you desire, and it provides answers.
if i try to run an application that uses dns on this machine however, it
bombs.
In light of this, I would say that it would be cool to put into the ipfw
or ipf code seeing as how there are already hooks into the network stack
in the code. I am not sure how people will take the ipfw implementation
soley because I know there was alot of "hacking" being done to it in the
recen
In the last episode (Apr 23), Wes Peters said:
> > I'm no kernel hacker, and trying to think of useful little projects
> > to change that. ;-)
> >
> > AFAIK, FreeBSD lacks support for TCP intercept. Is anyone already
> > working on this? Would it be of interest to anyone? My initial
> > though
I just need to make sure that I understand the code correctly in the TCP
stack. (We are trying to see how long the system waits before a SYN gets
retransmitted.)
When a SYN is sent, a keepalive timer is set with using the
TCPTV_KEEPALIVEINTVL = 75hz (??ms - escapes me at the moment). So an ack
"E.B. Dreger" wrote:
>
> Greetings all,
>
> I'm no kernel hacker, and trying to think of useful little projects to
> change that. ;-)
>
> AFAIK, FreeBSD lacks support for TCP intercept. Is anyone already working
> on this? Would it be of interest to anyone? My initial thoughts are that
> it
13 matches
Mail list logo
