On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 04:59:17AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:30:47 -0800
> > Bruce A. Mah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> bmah> I was playing around with netstat(1) on a recent RELENG_4 machine, and
> bmah> noticed something odd. Apparently, the input packet
> From: Patrick Hartling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Are there any good references for overhead associated with using IPsec?
> I realize that it is probably OS-dependent, but any numbers would be
> very helpful to me. I'm including a section about IPsec in my thesis,
> and i
Are there any good references for overhead associated with using IPsec?
I realize that it is probably OS-dependent, but any numbers would be
very helpful to me. I'm including a section about IPsec in my thesis,
and it would be useful to mention potential costs associated with it.
Thanks a bunch.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Remy Nonnenmacher
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 2:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FW: Network lockups on fxp0?
On 27 Mar, Deepak Jain wrote:
>
> I know
If memory serves me right, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:30:47 -0800
> > Bruce A. Mah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> bmah> I was playing around with netstat(1) on a recent RELENG_4 machine, and
> bmah> noticed something odd. Apparently, the input packet counter for the
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:30:47 -0800
> Bruce A. Mah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
bmah> I was playing around with netstat(1) on a recent RELENG_4 machine, and
bmah> noticed something odd. Apparently, the input packet counter for the
bmah> IPv6 loopback address never gets incremented (even
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:23:51AM -0800, Michael C . Wu scribbled:
| Added files:
| net/vrrp Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr
| pkg-plist
| Log:
| Add VRRP implementation from Linux. Many people have wanted this
| and thanks to minosh, we
Yar Tikhiy writes:
> > Mike Tancsa writes:
> > > >Not sure why this hasn't been detected before though. Below is
> > > >a possible patch.
> > >
> > > It has been at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25478 and
> > > discussed a few times in freebsd-net.
> >
> > Here is the better (?) pa
Luigi Rizzo writes:
> > > in this case, this person seemed to _need_ the interaction in
> > > order to have a bridging firewall
> >
> > that would be a brouter and not a bridge..Filering on IP at link layer..
> > yuck.
> >
> > It's really a crime against humanity but then that's never stopped
>
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 09:24:19AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > in this case, this person seemed to _need_ the interaction in
> > order to have a bridging firewall
>
>
> that would be a brouter and not a bridge..Filering on IP at link layer..
> yuck.
I would call it a packet filter style Fir
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 11:22:38AM -0600, Bill Fenner wrote:
>
> I prefer Jesper's other patch (the one that goes back to
> code = PRC_UNREACH_PORT). Note that the comment here:
Just committed, with jkh's permission I'll MFC it.
/Jesper
--
Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5
Daniel Wong wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I want to add a sysctl to the net.inet.ip what do I have to change ??
That depends upon what you are doing...
if you have your own module, you can add line of the form:
#include
myinteger = 0;
SYSCTL_INT(_net_inet_ip, IPCTL_FORWARDING, Mycutename, CTLFLAG_
Hi All,
I want to add a sysctl to the net.inet.ip what do I have to change ??
Thanks
Dan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Hi there,
I have configured a logical ethernet interface,
so called a tap interface (tap0).
I have also managed to bridged that interface to
my "real" ethernet interface (rl0) and it works fine.
Now to my question.
Is it possible to "tunnel" my tap interface including
the ip and ethernet hea
14 matches
Mail list logo
