Re: Kernel Panic on 4.3-RC #0 using PPPoE

2001-03-27 Thread Yar Tikhiy
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:30:49AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > Please take a careful look at the frames 6 through 9 of the stack > trace in PR#25478, so you may notice that your patch happens to do > nothing about the broblem. You are going to add a check for IFF_UP > to ether_output_frame() wh

RE: FW: Network lockups on fxp0?

2001-03-27 Thread Remy Nonnenmacher
On 27 Mar, Deepak Jain wrote: > > I know ifconfig up/down does not solve the problem. That was the first thing > tried. > > No pattern detected at the network traffic or application level, though > machines have been known to go down simultaneously (same minute/second) > though they service unre

Re: Kernel Panic on 4.3-RC #0 using PPPoE

2001-03-27 Thread Yar Tikhiy
Hi, On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:40:11PM -0800, Archie Cobbs wrote: > Mike Tancsa writes: > > >Not sure why this hasn't been detected before though. Below is > > >a possible patch. > > > > It has been at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25478 and > > discussed a few times in freebsd-net

Re: Kernel Panic on 4.3-RC #0 using PPPoE

2001-03-27 Thread Yar Tikhiy
Hi, On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:35:24PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > Any chances for > > kern/22176 > kern/22177 > kern/22178 > kern/22179 > kern/22181 > > These were raised on freebsd-net as well in the thread "A few nasty bugs in > the networking code" Thanks to Jordan Hubbard, I've got c

Re: netgraph ng_bridge and ipfilter

2001-03-27 Thread Luigi Rizzo
> > in this case, this person seemed to _need_ the interaction in > > order to have a bridging firewall > > that would be a brouter and not a bridge..Filering on IP at link layer.. > yuck. > > It's really a crime against humanity but then that's never stopped It's just a damn useful thing when

Re: kern secure level 2 and mpd-netgraph dialup

2001-03-27 Thread Julian Elischer
Peter Brezny wrote: > > Is it possible to have a kern_securelevel="2" and still run mpd-netgraph > using the default 'dialin' configuration? > > I've not had any luck but things appear to work ok when the > kern_securelevel="0" > you need to load kernel modules.. have you already loaded them?

Re: netgraph ng_bridge and ipfilter

2001-03-27 Thread Julian Elischer
Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > > > completely when a bridge is created with netgraph. I want to create a > > > > transparent firewall without NAT. I know OpenBSD has a bridge that works, > ... > > Netgraph should be completely orthogonal to the firewall stuff, > > i.e., they don't interact at all. > >

Re: Kernel Panic on 4.3-RC #0 using PPPoE

2001-03-27 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 12:40 PM 3/27/2001 -0800, Archie Cobbs wrote: >Mike Tancsa writes: > > >Not sure why this hasn't been detected before though. Below is > > >a possible patch. > > > > It has been at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25478 and > > discussed a few times in freebsd-net. > >Here is the bett

Re: D-Link problem

2001-03-27 Thread Ed Wynn
>This is a 530TX+ we're talking about here, correct? The box says DFE-538TX/R. The manual and disk omit the trailing "/R". >About the only thing I can do is obtain a card like yours and play with >it. If you can show me a link to the exact card that you have on the >D-Link web site, I can see w

RE: FW: Network lockups on fxp0?

2001-03-27 Thread Deepak Jain
I know ifconfig up/down does not solve the problem. That was the first thing tried. No pattern detected at the network traffic or application level, though machines have been known to go down simultaneously (same minute/second) though they service unrelated tasks. No flow control setting change

Re: FW: Network lockups on fxp0?

2001-03-27 Thread Jonathan Lemon
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >>fxp0: SCB timeout >>fxp0: DMA timeout >>(repeating) SCB timeout comes about because the chip is refusing to accept any more commands; in this case, it probably is wedged. Is there any pattern to this? Do you happen to have hardware flowcontrol enabled

nmap over pppoe

2001-03-27 Thread Paul Armor
Hi, I'm kinda new to this pppoe thing. I'm trying to run nmap on my external if and get a "permission denied" error when nmap tries to open. Anyone have any ideas on what I've misconfigured? Thanks in advance! Paul To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net"

Re: how to Getting Sysctl to work ....

2001-03-27 Thread Thomas Moestl
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 08:31:01AM +1000, Daniel Wong wrote: > I can't get my sysctl to come up in my sysctl -A > > I have in my kernel code defined SYSCTL_STRUCT(_net_inet_ip, ... ...) and > under in.h (I'm working under Ip) added my sysctl definition, i presume it's > just adding the extra enum

how to Getting Sysctl to work ....

2001-03-27 Thread Daniel Wong
Hi All, I can't get my sysctl to come up in my sysctl -A I have in my kernel code defined SYSCTL_STRUCT(_net_inet_ip, ... ...) and under in.h (I'm working under Ip) added my sysctl definition, i presume it's just adding the extra enum definition for my sysctl right ? I did a clean compile of th

FW: Network lockups on fxp0?

2001-03-27 Thread Deepak Jain
They are all on Cisco switches, each server is on a different port, and the servers are on different switches in different cities. The port graphs show no unusual traffic patterns in or out of the box. The mbuf settings are pretty generous: $ netstat -m 13033/16624/67520 mbufs in use (current/p

Re: D-Link problem

2001-03-27 Thread Bill Paul
> > Okay, tried this, same results. Still getting a 6 in the capabilities. G > I'm not familiar with the VIA Rhine. How can I check this? It's a moot point. I realized that in your earlier mail, you claimed that the card included a Linux driver called rtl8139.c, so it can't be a VIA

Re: Kernel Panic on 4.3-RC #0 using PPPoE

2001-03-27 Thread Archie Cobbs
Mike Tancsa writes: > >Not sure why this hasn't been detected before though. Below is > >a possible patch. > > It has been at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25478 and > discussed a few times in freebsd-net. Here is the better (?) patch. I'd like to commit this if nobody objects.. L

Re: mpd-netgraph bandwidth settings

2001-03-27 Thread Archie Cobbs
Dan Larsson writes: > | > | link.h: #define LINK_DEFAULT_BANDWIDTH 64000 /* 64k */ > | > | pptp.c: #define PPTP_CALL_MAX_BPS 64000 > | > | pptp.c: PPTP_OCR_RESL_OK, 0, 0, 64000 /*XXX*/ ); > | > | pptp_ctrl.c: con.speed = 64000;/* XXX */ > | > > | > Thank

kern secure level 2 and mpd-netgraph dialup

2001-03-27 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > Is it possible to have a kern_securelevel="2" and still run mpd-netgraph > using the default 'dialin' configuration? It should be. Are you preloading the appropriate NETGRAPH modules? -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same [EMA

kern secure level 2 and mpd-netgraph dialup

2001-03-27 Thread Peter Brezny
Is it possible to have a kern_securelevel="2" and still run mpd-netgraph using the default 'dialin' configuration? I've not had any luck but things appear to work ok when the kern_securelevel="0" One problem even then however, again using the default 'dialin' configuration, once the connection i

Re: 4.3 issue: new ICMP handling broke date(1)

2001-03-27 Thread Bill Fenner
I prefer Jesper's other patch (the one that goes back to code = PRC_UNREACH_PORT). Note that the comment here: /* * RFC 1122, Sections 3.2.2.1 and 4.2.3.9. * Treat subcodes 2,3 as immediate RST */

Re: 4.3 issue: new ICMP handling broke date(1)

2001-03-27 Thread Jonathan Lemon
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 06:36:46PM +0200, Jesper Skriver wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:19:22AM -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > > > I forget why I picked ENETRESET; probably because it was the first > > thing that leaped out at me when I quickly skimmed over > > looking for an appropriate

Re: 4.3 issue: new ICMP handling broke date(1)

2001-03-27 Thread Jesper Skriver
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:19:22AM -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 01:12:47PM +0200, Jesper Skriver wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:45:31PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > > > [making sure Jesper and Jonathan see this] > > > > > > -On [20010326 18:00], Bill Fen

Re: 4.3 issue: new ICMP handling broke date(1)

2001-03-27 Thread Jonathan Lemon
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 01:12:47PM +0200, Jesper Skriver wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:45:31PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > > [making sure Jesper and Jonathan see this] > > > > -On [20010326 18:00], Bill Fenner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > >Now that an ICMP port unreachable retu

Re: - Tip -

2001-03-27 Thread Jean-Christophe Varaillon
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Nick Rogness wrote: > On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Jean-Christophe Varaillon wrote: > > > > > And this is the result: > > --- > > BSD# killall tip > > No processes matching ``tip'' > > BSD# tip router > > tip: /dev/cuaa0: Device not configured > > link down > > BSD# > > --- > > >

Re: - Tip -

2001-03-27 Thread Nick Rogness
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Jean-Christophe Varaillon wrote: > > And this is the result: > --- > BSD# killall tip > No processes matching ``tip'' > BSD# tip router > tip: /dev/cuaa0: Device not configured > link down > BSD# > --- > > How can I configure /dev/cuaa0 ? You probably don't have co

Re: DNS rules etc

2001-03-27 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
cd /usr/ports/net/djbdns && make install clean then read the docs for dnscache and dnscache-conf at http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html i use tinydns and axfrdns here for my name services to replace bind, dnscache to screen out requests and to mux several other dns servers and bind boxes into one request

RE: - Tip -

2001-03-27 Thread Andy [Tecc Nops]
I use "minicom" to do this Hope that helps, Ak -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jean-Christophe Varaillon Sent: 27 March 2001 14:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: - Tip - Hi everybody, I have a router connected to a freeBSD machine (3.2

- Tip -

2001-03-27 Thread Jean-Christophe Varaillon
Hi everybody, I have a router connected to a freeBSD machine (3.2) via a console cable. I want to use tip from the freeBSD machine to logon to the router (cisco). On the freeBSD machine, I wrote that in /etc/remote: --- [...] router:dv=/dev/cuaa0:br#9600:pa=none: [...] --- Where: --- ls -l /de

Re: How to see kernel in userland ?

2001-03-27 Thread Wilbert de Graaf
> I need some help with kernel programming. I'm trying to find out how to get > my application to see kernel variables. I've tried to used sysctl_struct > calls on my variable but I couldn't get sysctl command to see it... how do > allow application to observer and maybe modify a variable inside a

Re: 4.3 issue: new ICMP handling broke date(1)

2001-03-27 Thread Jesper Skriver
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:45:31PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > [making sure Jesper and Jonathan see this] > > -On [20010326 18:00], Bill Fenner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >Now that an ICMP port unreachable returns ENETRESET and not ECONNREFUSED, > >setting the date on the command lin

Re: 4.3 issue: new ICMP handling broke date(1)

2001-03-27 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
[making sure Jesper and Jonathan see this] -On [20010326 18:00], Bill Fenner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >Now that an ICMP port unreachable returns ENETRESET and not ECONNREFUSED, >setting the date on the command line results in a bogusly-reported error. >Before you fix the bug in date/netdate.c,

How to see kernel in userland ?

2001-03-27 Thread Daniel Wong
Hi, I need some help with kernel programming. I'm trying to find out how to get my application to see kernel variables. I've tried to used sysctl_struct calls on my variable but I couldn't get sysctl command to see it... how do allow application to observer and maybe modify a variable inside a ke