On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Murray Taylor wrote:
> I've got the frame relay working, and am waiting now for
> some network delegation stuff external to me to complete.
> However I need to know if it is possible to use DNS
> as detailed below to allow the host spyder be visible to the
> Internet and our
On 0, Bill Fenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you pick a name in that MIB and say "snmptranslate ", does it
> tell you the OID associated with it? At one point you had to do something
> like "setenv MIBS ALL" to get net-snmp to notice new MIBs even if you
> put them in the right directory.
> > > completely when a bridge is created with netgraph. I want to create a
> > > transparent firewall without NAT. I know OpenBSD has a bridge that works,
...
> Netgraph should be completely orthogonal to the firewall stuff,
> i.e., they don't interact at all.
in this case, this person seemed to
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:08:56PM -0800, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Is there:
>
> - a way to make FreeBSD display a discovered PMTU?
>
On FreeBSD, PMTU is only used by TCP. TCP stores PTMU with other
metrics in the routing table. Thus, the way to display PMTU is to
query routing table: ``rout
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Archie Cobbs wrote:
| Dan Larsson writes:
| > | DL> How can I change the bandwidth from 64000bps to something else
| > | DL> when acting as a pptp-server?
| > |
| > | $cd src
| > | $grep 64000 *
| > | link.h: #define LINK_DEFAULT_BANDWIDTH 64000 /* 64k */
| > | ppt
Martin McFlySr wrote:
>
> Hello Dan Larsson,
>
> Monday, 26 March 2001, 20:44:47, you wrote:
>
> DL> How can I change the bandwidth from 64000bps to something else
> DL> when acting as a pptp-server?
>
> $cd src
> $grep 64000 *
> link.h: #define LINK_DEFAULT_BANDWIDTH 64000 /* 64k
Help
I've got the frame relay working, and am waiting now for
some network delegation stuff external to me to complete.
However I need to know if it is possible to use DNS
as detailed below to allow the host spyder be visible to the
Internet and our intranet, without polluting the nameservers
I guess you are talking about completely different topic from the
original submitter.
>Such hashing and comparison can be done more efficiently with functions tailored
>for IPv4 or IPv6 addresses. Generic sockaddr*-taking library functions could
>maintain this efficiency. I supp
>Is there:
> - a way to make FreeBSD display a discovered PMTU?
netstat -rnal (or something alike)?
itojun
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Is there:
- a way to make FreeBSD display a discovered PMTU?
or
- a userland tool that does PMTU discovery?
Thanks,
Lars
--
Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Information Sciences Institute
http://www.isi.edu/larse/University of Southern California
>
> Don't you receive the 2nd packet on the connected socket?
>
Suppose I've bound UDP serv_ip/serv_port (unconnected).
I loop receiving a datagram from client_ip/client_port.
I look for an entry in my hash table for client_ip/client_port. If there is
one, it points to a connected UDP socket f
Luigi Rizzo writes:
> > Another question. I saw a posting a while ago, ipfilter doesn't work
> > completely when a bridge is created with netgraph. I want to create a
> > transparent firewall without NAT. I know OpenBSD has a bridge that works,
> > but OpenBSD doesn't have netgraph.
> >
> > Is th
Dan Larsson writes:
> | DL> How can I change the bandwidth from 64000bps to something else
> | DL> when acting as a pptp-server?
> |
> | $cd src
> | $grep 64000 *
> | link.h: #define LINK_DEFAULT_BANDWIDTH 64000 /* 64k */
> | pptp.c: #define PPTP_CALL_MAX_BPS 64000
> | pptp.c: P
Hi Bill,
I used this MIB: ftp://ftp.alliedtelesyn.com/pub/repeater/athub.mib
I saved it in /usr/local/share/snmp/mibs/ATI-MIB.txt
and commented out these lines
DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS enterprises, Counter
FROM RFC1155-SMI
DisplaySt
Perhaps the MIB has more errors than you know. If you give me a pointer
to the MIB and some samples of the numerical OIDs that you're getting I
might be able to help.
If you pick a name in that MIB and say "snmptranslate ", does it
tell you the OID associated with it? At one point you had to d
>I'm not sure when this capability appeared. There is no man page for
>pccard_ether or start_if and I totally missed it until now.
It appeared in -stable on February 4th; 4.3 will be the first release
so it's not particularly surprising that you didn't know about it.
I've been modifying /etc/pcc
Hi everybody,
I installed ucd-snmp from the ports on freebsd 4.2, and would like to use
it to collect information from an allied telesyn TS24TR managed hub.
I can retrieve information correctly with snmpwalk/get. etc. , but the hub
specific entries appear in numerical form only.
I did copy the
> applications should be written so that it would work on both
> IPv4-only, IPv6-only and IPv4/v6 dual stack kernels, by using
> getaddrinfo(3) and getnameinfo(3). you do not need to check if you
> write applications properly.
>
> itojun
Sometimes we want to hash, compare
Thanks for the suggestion.
I'm not sure when this capability appeared. There is no man page for
pccard_ether or start_if and I totally missed it until now.
While placing the commands in /etc/start_if.wi0 is probably an
excellent idea, placing the command in pccard.conf works just fine and
will n
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Martin McFlySr wrote:
| DL> How can I change the bandwidth from 64000bps to something else
| DL> when acting as a pptp-server?
|
| $cd src
| $grep 64000 *
| link.h: #define LINK_DEFAULT_BANDWIDTH 64000 /* 64k */
| pptp.c: #define PPTP_CALL_MAX_BPS 64000
| ppt
Hello Dan Larsson,
Monday, 26 March 2001, 20:44:47, you wrote:
DL> How can I change the bandwidth from 64000bps to something else
DL> when acting as a pptp-server?
$cd src
$grep 64000 *
link.h: #define LINK_DEFAULT_BANDWIDTH 64000 /* 64k */
pptp.c: #define PPTP_CALL_MAX_BPS
Kevin> I just put the wicontrol commands into /etc/pccard.conf.
A better way to do this is to put the setup commands into
/etc/start_if.wi0. That way the changes don't get stomped if/when
you upgrade. Here's the /etc/start_if.wi0 I used at the IETF
last week:
wicontrol -i ${interface} -s VE6
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> Hi,
>
> Another question. I saw a posting a while ago, ipfilter doesn't work
> completely when a bridge is created with netgraph. I want to create a
> transparent firewall without NAT. I know OpenBSD has a bridge that works,
> but OpenBSD
How can I change the bandwidth from 64000bps to something else
when acting as a pptp-server?
Regards
+--
Dan Larsson | Tel: +46 8 550 120 21
Tyfon Svenska AB | Fax: +46 8 550 120 02
GPG and PGP keys | finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "un
Hi,
Another question. I saw a posting a while ago, ipfilter doesn't work
completely when a bridge is created with netgraph. I want to create a
transparent firewall without NAT. I know OpenBSD has a bridge that works,
but OpenBSD doesn't have netgraph.
Is this still the case with 4.3-RC
Peter
Now that an ICMP port unreachable returns ENETRESET and not ECONNREFUSED,
setting the date on the command line results in a bogusly-reported error.
Before you fix the bug in date/netdate.c, it tends to report EADDRINUSE;
afterwards it tends to report ENETRESET.
Why did the handling of "udp port
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 08:02:04AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> >
> > I wrote:
> > >
> > > Unless someone has a good motivation for not doing this, I am going
> > > to commit the attached patch that disallows indirect routes with
> > > indirect gateways.
> > >
> > Okay, I wi
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> I wrote:
> >
> > Unless someone has a good motivation for not doing this, I am going
> > to commit the attached patch that disallows indirect routes with
> > indirect gateways.
> >
> Okay, I will rephrase this. Can you give me at least one example when
> adding an indir
>Fine. I'm including another patch with a slight change. I don't know if
>this will make a difference or not since I've never known this step to be
>necessary.
Okay, tried this, same results. Still getting a 6 in the capabilities.
>If this doesn't work, I suggest putting the card in a different
29 matches
Mail list logo
