I wrote:
>
> Unless someone has a good motivation for not doing this, I am going
> to commit the attached patch that disallows indirect routes with
> indirect gateways.
>
Okay, I will rephrase this. Can you give me at least one example when
adding an indirect route with indirect gateway will wo
Dan Larsson writes:
> Got this in my mpd logfile while trying to setup 32 pptp links:
> Mar 21 15:30:27 pptpbox mpd: [pptp11] too many bundles! (increase MAX_BUNDS)
> Mar 21 15:30:27 pptpbox mpd: [pptp12] too many bundles! (increase MAX_BUNDS)
> Mar 21 15:30:27 pptpbox mpd: [pptp13] too many bundl
< said:
>What is the goal of the XRESOLVE mechanism. Is it to allow code in the
> kernel to inform a userland daemon that a routing lookup was performed
> and it failed, or is it to allow code in the kernel to have a userland
> daemon resolve a route for it?
Yes.
> If it is the second, ho
What is the goal of the XRESOLVE mechanism. Is it to allow code in the
kernel to inform a userland daemon that a routing lookup was performed
and it failed, or is it to allow code in the kernel to have a userland
daemon resolve a route for it?
If it is the second, how does the userland daem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>I have put together IPV6/IPV4 code for SCTP in FreeBSD. I
> >>am entering the final stages of testing and I would like
> >>to contribute this if I can...
> >Great!
> >>Who should I contact too coordinate getting this in?
> >I'm willing to review the code and take re
>>I have put together IPV6/IPV4 code for SCTP in FreeBSD. I
>>am entering the final stages of testing and I would like
>>to contribute this if I can...
>Great!
>>Who should I contact too coordinate getting this in?
>I'm willing to review the code and take responsibility for
>getting the bits comm
Jonathan Lemon wrote:
>
> In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >I have put together IPV6/IPV4 code for SCTP in FreeBSD. I
> >am entering the final stages of testing and I would like
> >to contribute this if I can...
>
> Great!
>
> >Who should I contact too coordinate getting this in?
>
>
< said:
> The routing code (bogusly?) allows to add an indirect route with
> also indirect gateway. This results in some nasty bugs:
My sentiment is the same as Wes's.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
< said:
>> [quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> the an driver. I have re-written parts of it to conform to
>> the specification for the 4800 if someone is interested
> that you have plenty of documented information on hand to support
> your changes.
One would assume that someone working for t
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>I have put together IPV6/IPV4 code for SCTP in FreeBSD. I
>am entering the final stages of testing and I would like
>to contribute this if I can...
Great!
>Who should I contact too coordinate getting this in?
I'm willing to review the code and take res
Hi
I am having a machine with 3 interfaces, fxp0, nge0 and nge1. nge0 and
nge1 are pseudo ethernet interfaces implemented using 'ng_eiface'
netgraph nodes in freebsd-current.
I wish that the response to a ping from host1(some machine on LAN)
to fxp0/nge0/nge1 should come from the respective inte
Hi:
I have put together IPV6/IPV4 code for SCTP in FreeBSD. I
am entering the final stages of testing and I would like
to contribute this if I can...
---
I have changes for
---
in_proto.c (adds SCTP glue for IPv4)
in6_proto.c (adds SCTP glue for IPv6)
in.h (adds IP
Can anyone tell me smth how configure pppd with pppunit support.
pppunit as I know is such parameter for pppd that has such properties
that it can link com5 -with ppp5.
for example:
cuaa5
ppunit5
so this interface will only up on ppp5.
Thank you very much for any help.
To Unsubscribe: send
< said:
> I see. Thus a separate type is needed for the vlan interface, and
> /usr/sbin/arp should be modified to comprehend the new arp-capable
> interface type, shouldn't it?
Aye.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the mes
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The routing code (bogusly?) allows to add an indirect route with
> also indirect gateway. This results in some nasty bugs:
>
> : Script started on Wed Mar 21 13:17:47 2001
> :
> : freebsd# netstat -rn
> : Routing tables
> :
> : Internet:
> : Destination
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 03:09:59PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > Isn't it better to assign the IFT_ETHER type to the vlan interface?
> > There might be other places in the code where vlans would behave
> > unexpectedly because of their type...
>
> No, because SNMP and potentially
Has anyone tried to create a logparser/statistics reporter from
the mpd-netgraph (pptp) logfile output?
Regards
+--
Dan Larsson | Tel: +46 8 550 120 21
Tyfon Svenska AB | Fax: +46 8 550 120 02
GPG and PGP keys | finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
Coming back to you with a reply I should have given earlier. See below.
In the mean time I have applied one of Ruslan Emirov's patches and had
no panics ever since. Clearly not a hardware issue but faulty code :) ...
I also see that there has been applied a patch (by jkh) in the CVS t
Got this in my mpd logfile while trying to setup 32 pptp links:
Mar 21 15:30:27 pptpbox mpd: [pptp11] too many bundles! (increase MAX_BUNDS)
Mar 21 15:30:27 pptpbox mpd: [pptp12] too many bundles! (increase MAX_BUNDS)
Mar 21 15:30:27 pptpbox mpd: [pptp13] too many bundles! (increase MAX_BUNDS)
Ma
Hi!
The routing code (bogusly?) allows to add an indirect route with
also indirect gateway. This results in some nasty bugs:
: Script started on Wed Mar 21 13:17:47 2001
:
: freebsd# netstat -rn
: Routing tables
:
: Internet:
: DestinationGatewayFlags Refs Use
20 matches
Mail list logo
