dhcpd question

2001-03-20 Thread danh
I have dhcp-2.0.5 running on freebsd 4.2, I have read the documentation and numerous sample configurations, I am not sure if it is possible to do what I wish, I wish for a machine to automatically grab an ip address reserved for it, but only by providing its name. so for instance in my curre

Re: TCP/IP stack

2001-03-20 Thread Wes Peters
Vishwanath P wrote: > > Hi , > > can any one help me with this. > how is the tcp/ip stack running.is it a single process? or is it > running as multiple processes. > pls tell me if i do ps -aef which is the process concerned with the > tcp/ip stack implementation. > > As far as i know inetd dae

Re: Ipv6_forward function.

2001-03-20 Thread Wes Peters
ravi prasad wrote: > > Dear sir, > While going thought the module ipv6_input.c i found that the code for > ipv6_forward function is missing. It was commented that for now we will > discard the packet. In the ipv6_forward function m_free() was callled & the > m_buf is freed. Kindly mail me if this

Re: A few nasty bugs in the networking code

2001-03-20 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 20 Mar 2001 15:10:25 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: >< said: > >> Isn't it better to assign the IFT_ETHER type to the vlan interface? >> There might be other places in the code where vlans would behave >> unexpectedly because of their type... > >No, because SNMP and potentially

Re: net boot ?

2001-03-20 Thread Thierry Herbelot
Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Is there a way to net boot a brand new PC ( without O.S ) > > using the bootp/tftp scheme at FreeBSD 4.xx ? > > as long as the network board is able to boot on LAN > > try one of the latest snapshots of etherboot (should be > in the ports) > > cheers

Re: A few nasty bugs in the networking code

2001-03-20 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > Isn't it better to assign the IFT_ETHER type to the vlan interface? > There might be other places in the code where vlans would behave > unexpectedly because of their type... No, because SNMP and potentially other network management utilities need to know about it. -GAWollman To Uns

Re: A few nasty bugs in the networking code

2001-03-20 Thread Yar Tikhiy
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 07:05:58AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > Do any of the VLAN patches fix the arp -d bug with VLAN interfaces ? > > i.e. arp -d does not work > > cbackup2# ifconfig vlan0 > vlan0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet 192.168.112.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.112.255

netstat(1) bug in per-address packet counts?

2001-03-20 Thread Bruce A. Mah
Hi Joe-- I was playing around with netstat(1) on a recent RELENG_4 machine, and noticed something odd. Apparently, the input packet counter for the IPv6 loopback address never gets incremented (even after some pings, the input packet count on lo0 is still 0): bmah-freebsd-0:netstat% ping6 ::

An interesting static nat problem.

2001-03-20 Thread Peter Brezny
I've recently run into an interesting problem. I've got an external machine x.x.x.y running static nat on it's external interface to translate x.x.x.x to 10.30.1.20 on the inside. The 10.30.1.20 machine runs a mail server. This external machine is also configured as a secondary mx for the inte

Re: A few nasty bugs in the networking code

2001-03-20 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 19 Mar 2001 13:00:32 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: >On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 06:32:44PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> >> > We are heading to a new release, but the bugs are still there. >> > >> > Could a commiter do me a favor and take a look at the following reports: >> >> wh

Re: Multiport serial non PnP ISA card with 4.2

2001-03-20 Thread Kurakin Roman
Mike Nowlin wrote: >>> I am using a pair of Digiboard 8-port dumb serial cards (don't remember the >>> actual model number) on a 4.2 machine with the standard shared interrupt >>> code... ISA, no P&P, everything configured by jumpers - works fine. >>> (Connects to the serial consoles on a b

Re: A few nasty bugs in the networking code

2001-03-20 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
-On [20010320 04:00], Josef Karthauser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [local gnats] >I do it just in case I need access to a PR. It's come in handy having >it lying around. Same here, and that coupled with X and tkgnats, lub it. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven/Asmodai .oUo. asmo

Re: net boot ?

2001-03-20 Thread Luigi Rizzo
> Hi > > Is there a way to net boot a brand new PC ( without O.S ) > using the bootp/tftp scheme at FreeBSD 4.xx ? > as long as the network board is able to boot on LAN try one of the latest snapshots of etherboot (should be in the ports) cheers luigi > TIA > -- > Frank Bonnet

net boot ?

2001-03-20 Thread Frank Bonnet
Hi Is there a way to net boot a brand new PC ( without O.S ) using the bootp/tftp scheme at FreeBSD 4.xx ? as long as the network board is able to boot on LAN TIA -- Frank Bonnet Systemes et Reseaux UNIX Groupe ESIEE Paris To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebs