fail to build check_del example from O'Reilly's DNS & BIND

Hi, A bit off topic, but still. Has anyone managed to build the check_del.c (really ch09.check_del.811.c) program referenced in O'Reilly's DNS and BIND book with a decently fresh bind8 (8.2.2 or 8.2.3, in 4.2 or 4-stable). I just can't

No Subject

auth 3e06e69a subscribe freebsd-net [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Re: HEADSUP! New netgraph code coming

Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Something is terribly broken with ng_ether at the moment. It lacks a > > MODULE_VERSION line. > is this required for something to be a depency? Yes. > Where is it documented? It's not, AFAIK. UTSL (like the rest of us)

Re: mpd problem / multiple pptp clients behind one nat

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Let's say my network is set up this way: > > client1---\ > client2\ > client3freebsd gw + natd --- internet -- freebsd machine > running >

Re: more weird mpd problems

Dan Holliman writes: > mpd.links file: > > pptp0: > set link type pptp > set pptp self 128.32.43.97 > set pptp enable incoming > set pptp disable originate > > mpd.conf file: > > default: > load pptp0 > > pptp0: > new -i ng0 pptp0 pptp0 >

more weird mpd problems

I've gotten mpd-netgraph to work successfully on several networks with a traditional nat box as the gateway, just for fun, but for the network I am actually responsible for, I haven't been able to set it up successfully. I can get a pptp client to connect, the logs say I connect, but I can't actu

Re: HEADSUP! New netgraph code coming

Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jun Kuriyama wrote: > > > # kldload ng_bridge > > > kldload: can't load ng_bridge: Exec format error > > > And /var/log/messages says: > > > > > > Jan 12 16:27:07 waterblue /boot/kernel/kernel: KLD ng_bridge.ko: depend

Re: Problem w/ traffic shaper? (dummynet) (solved)

-- Mark Lastdrager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ipfw pipe 1 config bw 1MBit/s delay 10ms >> ipfw pipe 2 config bw 1MBit/s delay 10ms > Try Mbit/s (MB/s is Megabytes!) Ah, I see..so it's the second character which is interpreted case significant and not the rest (bit/s)...nice trap :-) >> Wh

Re: Problem w/ traffic shaper? (dummynet)

At Sun, 14 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hello, > >I've set up a very simple traffic-shaper: > >ipfw add pipe 1 ip from any to any via fxp2 in >ipfw add pipe 2 ip from any to any via fxp2 out >ipfw pipe 1 config bw 1MBit/s delay 10ms >ipfw pipe 2 config bw 1MBit/s delay 10ms > Try Mbit/s (

Problem w/ traffic shaper? (dummynet)

Hello, I've set up a very simple traffic-shaper: ipfw add pipe 1 ip from any to any via fxp2 in ipfw add pipe 2 ip from any to any via fxp2 out ipfw pipe 1 config bw 1MBit/s delay 10ms ipfw pipe 2 config bw 1MBit/s delay 10ms 'ipfw show' looks corrrect: 00100 9446889 4072588337 pipe 1 ip fro