On Jan 10, 12:05am, Wes Peters wrote:
} Subject: Re: Spoofing multicast addresses
} The real problem with the "stream" attack was not the volume of incoming
} SYN packets, but the reflector nature of the attack when using forged
} multicast source addresses. The code did not correctly "ignore" t
On Jan 10, 1:13am, Mike Silbersack wrote:
} Subject: Re: Spoofing multicast addresses
}
} On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Wes Peters wrote:
}
} > Don Lewis wrote:
} > > A good reason for putting these checks in their present location is
} > > that it gets them out of the main code path. Under normal circ
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Wes Peters wrote:
> Don Lewis wrote:
> > A good reason for putting these checks in their present location is
> > that it gets them out of the main code path. Under normal circumstances,
> > the vast majority of the incoming packets will be for established
> > connections an
Don Lewis wrote:
>
> [ freebsd-net added ]
>
> On Jan 9, 6:58pm, Wes Peters wrote:
> } Subject: Re: Spoofing multicast addresses
> } Mike Silbersack wrote:
> } >
> } > The check is done when the SYN is received, hence such a situation as you
> } > describe should not be able to occur.
> } >
> }
[ freebsd-net added ]
On Jan 9, 6:58pm, Wes Peters wrote:
} Subject: Re: Spoofing multicast addresses
} Mike Silbersack wrote:
} >
} > The check is done when the SYN is received, hence such a situation as you
} > describe should not be able to occur.
} >
} > >From tcp_input.c:
} >
} >
I'm having problems getting throughout above 63Mbps with
a 4.2_STABLE system and a D-link DFE530 Fast Ethernet card.
I've put full details of the problem and the information I
have up at http://minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au/Beowulf/Problem/
Would some kind soul have a look and see if they can spot anyth
>The only problem I've encountered is that, when making Win2K and FreeBSD
>interoperate, the IKE's phase 2 only suceeds if
>Win2K initiates the process. If racoon is to start it, Win2k will not
>accept any proposal for phase 2, complaining that the dh group number
>(which should correctly be eit
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Peter Brezny wrote:
> Is there an easy way to convert a secondary bind8 name server to a primary?
>
> I had hoped to just be able to change the designation in the named.conf file
> from type slave to type master, however when i look at the individual zone
> files, they 've go
On 10-Jan-01 Peter Brezny wrote:
> Is there an easy way to convert a secondary bind8 name server to a primary?
>
> I had hoped to just be able to change the designation in the named.conf file
> from type slave to type master, however when i look at the individual zone
> files, they 've got a lot
Is there an easy way to convert a secondary bind8 name server to a primary?
I had hoped to just be able to change the designation in the named.conf file
from type slave to type master, however when i look at the individual zone
files, they 've got a lot of mish mash in there from being secondary
I've read the mini-howto on how to setup IPSEC on the FreeBSD
(http://asherah.dyndns.org/~josh/ipsec-howto.txt) and have been most
succesful so far.
I would be very glad if anyone could help me on the following matter:
The only problem I've encountered is that, when making Win2K and FreeBSD
in
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:02:17PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
> [ cc: trimmed ]
>
> On Dec 31, 9:07pm, Jesper Skriver wrote:
> } Subject: Re: what to do now ? Was: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_icmp.c
> } On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 03:51:18PM +0100, Jesper Skriver wrote:
> } > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000
12 matches
Mail list logo
