Re: general question re: PTR records.

2001-01-06 Thread Wes Peters
Randy Bush wrote: > > >>> jack.com. IN A x.y.z.q > >>> ... > >>> q.z.y.x-in.addr.arpa. IN PTR jack.com. > >> hint: what would be the label of such a zone? i.e. what is the label on the > >> soa? > > The domain in reverse, i.e. > > 42.168.192.in-addr.arpa. IN SOA

Re: general question re: PTR records.

2001-01-06 Thread Randy Bush
>>> jack.com. IN A x.y.z.q >>> ... >>> q.z.y.x-in.addr.arpa. IN PTR jack.com. >> hint: what would be the label of such a zone? i.e. what is the label on the >> soa? > The domain in reverse, i.e. > 42.168.192.in-addr.arpa. IN SOA > would begin the SOA record for a

Re: general question re: PTR records.

2001-01-06 Thread Wes Peters
Randy Bush wrote: > > > jack.com. IN A x.y.z.q > > ... > > q.z.y.x-in.addr.arpa. IN PTR jack.com. > > hint: what would be the label of such a zone? i.e. what is the label on the > soa? The domain in reverse, i.e. 42.168.192.in-addr.arpa.IN SOA would begin

Warning: wild pointer somewhere in netgraph.

2001-01-06 Thread Julian Elischer
I have uncovered some odd behavior on my machine here using netgraph since the last changes.. I'm trying to find the problem but I need sleep... If you have used he latest netgraph code, let me know what modules you are using and how so I can try narrow my search.. thanks.. Julian -- __

Re: general question re: PTR records.

2001-01-06 Thread Greg Black
Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > > Is it just a really bad idea? > > It's an interesting idea, but it assumes a picture of the world that > doesn't correspond with actual reality. The expression "actual reality" should be read as "the BIND way of doing things". There are alternative DNS implementa

Setup an IPSec VLAN with two cablemodem's

2001-01-06 Thread Henk Wevers
Hi, I did not find enough information on how to connect two intranet's thru an secure IPSec connection. After a few hour's work i did find a working configuration. Hope this document could help somebody with making IPSec VLAN VPN connections. http://FreeBSD.cg.nu/ipsec.html Please give comment's

Re: general question re: PTR records.

2001-01-06 Thread Randy Bush
> jack.com. IN A x.y.z.q > ... > q.z.y.x-in.addr.arpa. IN PTR jack.com. hint: what would be the label of such a zone? i.e. what is the label on the soa? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Re: general question re: PTR records.

2001-01-06 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Peter Brezny wrote: > Why are PTR records placed in zone db files separate from all other resource > records? Because they're not in the same zone. > For small domains, wouldn't it be simpler to just have your reverse ip to > name mappings in the same zone db file as your

general question re: PTR records.

2001-01-06 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > Why are PTR records placed in zone db files separate from all other resource > records? Because they are in a different zone! -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Re: Problem with Multihomed Machine

2001-01-06 Thread Wes Peters
Sean wrote: > > Thanks for your help! It now seems to be working, at least for > connecting W2K to the internet through FreeBSD. Here's a general > question. Are UDP packets mail packets? I don't know of any mail protocol that uses UDP. You're probably seeing the DNS lookup requests for the

general question re: PTR records.

2001-01-06 Thread Peter Brezny
Why are PTR records placed in zone db files separate from all other resource records? For small domains, wouldn't it be simpler to just have your reverse ip to name mappings in the same zone db file as your forward name to ip mappings? Something like jack.com. IN A x.y.z.q ...

Re:Problem with Multihomed Machine

2001-01-06 Thread Sean
Thanks for your help!  It now seems to be working, at least for connecting W2K to the internet through FreeBSD.  Here's a general question.  Are UDP packets mail packets?  I think I need to add some "udp divert" rule for natd, and a "udp allow all" rule for ipfw, since I don't have mail connectiv