Re: Problems with VLAN and natd.

Wes Peters wrote: > > Thierry Herbelot wrote: > > > > Wes Peters wrote: > > > > > [SNIP] > > > > > > Doing link-layer encapsulation modules is really not very difficult. > > > I've written pretty much the full complement, covering ethernet (10, > > > 100, and 1000), FDDI/CDDI, token ring, ATM, an

IP Filter auth rule

Hi, I\'m playing around the auth rule and the sample userauth.c of IP Filter on FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE and below are some results and questions: 1. There is a typo in ip_auth.c which causes the ioctl(SIOCAUTHW) unable to fetch all the fields of the frauth_t struct. Below is a patch for 4.2-R

Re: IPSTEALTH - transparent router

Hello, ( > Attila Nagy) > > I have many routers with wavelan card working with freeBSD and i am > > trying without sucessfull use IPSTEALTH work i want whem one machine > > make traceroute dont show my router and go a way > sysctl -w net.inet.ip.stealth=1 ...or you can live happy with IPFilter'

Re: Problems with VLAN and natd.

Wes Peters wrote: > [SNIP] > > Doing link-layer encapsulation modules is really not very difficult. > I've written pretty much the full complement, covering ethernet (10, > 100, and 1000), FDDI/CDDI, token ring, ATM, and Frame Relay. (Chuck, What about a netgraph-enabled ATM NIC driver ? (this

Re: Problems with VLAN and natd.

Wes Peters wrote: > > "C. Stephen Gunn" wrote: > > > > Netgraph is an excellent technology. While your comment makes > > sense, there are several issues that will need to be addressed. > > For instance, the current ARP implementation in FreeBSD is > > entangled with the generic ethernet code. >

Re: Problems with VLAN and natd.

"C. Stephen Gunn" wrote: > > On Sun, 31 Dec 2000 19:54:19 PST, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > The current VLAN (and Ethernet) implementaiton in FreeBSD needs work. > > > FreeBSD should should handle multiple ethernet encapsulations on > > > the same physical interface, and relay packets to/from

Re: Dummynet problem

> I tried to configure dummynet to allow for normal work when downloading files > using queue mechanism (4.2-STABLE). > > IPFW rules are: > > add 100 queue 10 tcp from any to any uid dnld1 in > add 200 queue 11 ip from any to any > > queue 10 config weight 1 pipe 1 > queue 11 confi

Re: ipfw uid rules and matching specific services for bandwidth limiting

the easy way could be (probably) force the ftp daemon run as some other user, or assign a second IP to the server and make sure that the ftpd binds to the second address. But in the end, one probably might also like to have a separate namespace where processes can [be forced to] register and who

Re: IPSTEALTH - transparent router

Hello, > I have many routers with wavelan card working with freeBSD and i am > trying without sucessfull use IPSTEALTH work i want whem one machine > make traceroute dont show my router and go a way sysctl -w net.inet.ip.stealth=1 -

Re: Problems with VLAN and natd.

On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, C. Stephen Gunn wrote: > For example, you would no longer simply ``ifconfig xl'', but > associate a netgraph link-layer node on top of the xl interface, > and a netgraph interface node on top of the link-layer node, which > would function (mostly) like xl does now. Interesting

Re: Problems with VLAN and natd.

On Sun, 31 Dec 2000 19:54:19 PST, Julian Elischer wrote: > > The current VLAN (and Ethernet) implementaiton in FreeBSD needs work. > > FreeBSD should should handle multiple ethernet encapsulations on > > the same physical interface, and relay packets to/from some subordinate > > interface. This

Re: ipfw uid rules and matching specific services for bandwidth limiting

On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 01:14:18AM +0100, Anders Nordby wrote: > FYI I am running 4.1.1-STABLE as of Tue Oct 24 01:25:55 CEST 2000, and top(1) > shows all proftpd processes as being owned by root. If I filter on uid root, the rules will match the packets (I tried with specific IPs + uid root): 0

Re: ipfw uid rules and matching specific services for bandwidth limiting

On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 05:24:09PM -0600, Bill Fumerola wrote: >> Are people actually using uid type rules heavily? I'm having trouble matching >> the packets generated by programs like Apache and ProFTPD. I believe that may >> be because of root binding the ports these programs use before they se

Re: ipfw uid rules and matching specific services for bandwidth limiting

On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 09:08:26PM +0100, Anders Nordby wrote: > Are people actually using uid type rules heavily? I'm having trouble matching > the packets generated by programs like Apache and ProFTPD. I believe that may > be because of root binding the ports these programs use before they setu

ipfw uid rules and matching specific services for bandwidth limiting

Hello, Are people actually using uid type rules heavily? I'm having trouble matching the packets generated by programs like Apache and ProFTPD. I believe that may be because of root binding the ports these programs use before they setuid() or something, I'm not sure. Particularly I have trouble m

Dummynet problem

I tried to configure dummynet to allow for normal work when downloading files using queue mechanism (4.2-STABLE). IPFW rules are: add 100 queue 10 tcp from any to any uid dnld1 in add 200 queue 11 ip from any to any queue 10 config weight 1 pipe 1 queue 11 config weight 10 pipe 1 m

IPSTEALTH - transparent router

Hi. I have many routers with wavelan card working with freeBSD and i am trying without sucessfull use IPSTEALTH work this is my kernel options options IPFIREWALL options IPDIVERT options IPSTEALTH options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD op