[Bug 211004] [PATCH] lang/mono: update from 4.2.3.4 to 4.4.1.0

2016-07-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211004 --- Comment #10 from sergey.v.bru...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Carsten Larsen from comment #9) Hello, Carsten! Could you please point out the errors? Best regards, Sergey Brunov. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assig

[Bug 211004] [PATCH] lang/mono: update from 4.2.3.4 to 4.4.1.0

2016-07-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211004 --- Comment #11 from Carsten Larsen --- (In reply to sergey.v.brunov from comment #10) Hi Sergey Same error as before. Remember to check the files in PATCHDIR are applied correctly. They are still there: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-

[Bug 211004] [PATCH] lang/mono: update from 4.2.3.4 to 4.4.1.0

2016-07-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211004 --- Comment #12 from sergey.v.bru...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Carsten Larsen from comment #11) Hello, Carsten! According to the documentation added and removed files — special case (https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/po

[Bug 211367] lang/mono net-p2p/sonarr Sonarr crashes on startup with SIGSEGV since base r296727 on 10.3-STABLE

2016-07-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211367 Andrej Ebert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||f...@freebsd.org Flags

[Bug 211367] lang/mono net-p2p/sonarr Sonarr crashes on startup with SIGSEGV since base r296727 on 10.3-STABLE

2016-07-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211367 --- Comment #1 from Mark Felder --- Weird, that SmartOS bug is for their lx branded zones. We're running Sonarr/mono natively on FreeBSD. I haven't been able to reproduce this, and my box running Sonarr is a CURRENT machine with Sonarr in

[Bug 211367] lang/mono net-p2p/sonarr Sonarr crashes on startup with SIGSEGV since base r296727 on 10.3-STABLE

2016-07-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211367 --- Comment #2 from Andrej Ebert --- Yeah, it wouldn't manifest on 10.2, not even on 10.3 RELEASE, but try anything higher than 10-STABLE base r296649 and you'll see it :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for t