20.12.15 19:50, Michael Grimm пишет:
> But I am bit stuck in finding a way to start my jails in a
> pre-defined order (e.g. first DNS, then mail, …). Well, I can achieve
> that during boot time by using jail_list="dns mail …" in rc.conf.
> But, this is respected during boot time, *only*. Whenever
Hi!
I'm porting some Fedora Core 6 applications. Since the FreeBSD
package of a FC6 port should be build with non-default
compat.linux.osrelease and pointyhat is using jails to create
packages, here is the question at the Subject.
I know it _may_ be changed (I've tried and succeeded). Can someon
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:49:13 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Roman Divacky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 6 Aug 2007
> 11:04:22 +0200):
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:33:03AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> >> Quoting Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ck
fdescfs 4 synthetic
-
... nfs seems not to be jail friendly. Here is the question at
subject. Thanks!
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:37:21 -0400 Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > ... nfs seems not to be jail friendly. Here is the question at
> > subject. Thanks!
> You can NFS mount on the host, and it will be visible within
#x27;s a loopback mount. But again, I
> haven't tested any of them (I have them patched locally, but even the
> initial testing is on my TODO list with a low priority).
I see. If my task won't change I'll check what I ca do. Thanks!
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Researc
associated with at most one client.
Thanks, Robert. Security issues are surely should be taken into
consideration here. I'll check if the task may be changed towards
static mounts (i.e. outside the jail).
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone &
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:04:01 -0400 Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:37:21 -0400 Bill Moran wrote:
> >
> > > In response to Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > >
> >
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:20:34 -0400 (EDT) Randy Schultz wrote:
> Been using jails for a while with 6.2 and 6.3. Today I'm working my first lab
> box with 7.0-RELEASE. Set everything up with ezjail, e.g. ezjail-admin
> create... Everything builds/installs fine, no barks. Sudo installed via make
t.my.domain)
> by services.ipt.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD))
> id 1KNuOp-000Ily-Mp; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:58:19 +0400
> To: Randy Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: visudo non-functional in 7.0-RELEASE jail
> References
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:04:16 -0400 (EDT) Randy Schultz wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Edwin Groothuis spaketh thusly:
> -}Since lock_file() consists of three different functions depending
> -}on your capabilities, could you pastebin the output of your config.log
> -}somwwhere to figure out which wa
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:30:21 +0700 huynhnguyen wrote:
> o bge0: 192.168.1.2/24
> bge0_alias0: 192.168.1.3/24
> o bge1: 11.0.0.2/24
> bge1_alias0: 11.0.0.3/24
Sorry, it's not an answer to your original question. But imho you
can't use /24 for an alias address. According to ifconfig(8):
-
Sorry for freebsd-jail subscribers, this is an information for
"huynhnguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
FYI: if you are interested here is the answer from you MTA:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:42:53 +0300 Mail Delivery System wrote:
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
> A mes
Hello List,
has something changed at CURRENT with sysvipc jail handling?
This jail has been working fine for almost a year.
I've upgrade CURRENT to yesterday's sources and can't start
postgresql in a jail anymore:
- the jail -
% tail -2 /var/log/messages
May 31 18:22:47 pg postgres[55425
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:05:03 +0200 Henrik Lidström wrote:
> Quoting "Bjoern A. Zeeb" :
> > On Sun, 31 May 2009, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> has something changed at CURRENT with sysvipc jail handling?
> >> This jail has been
Kalle Møller writes:
> I've reinstalled my box and wanted t install ezjail again.
>
> As I remember (when you use flavours) the ezjail.flavour gets run when you
> start a flavoured jail for the first time,
> this does not happen for my jails. They create and the files from the
> flavour get moved
Kalle Møller writes:
>> I've got the same behaviour. Seems that the script ezjail.flavour
>> is not executed because it uses old rc rules and so it is ingored
>> at startup.
> What are the new rc rules, because it looks fair simple to correct, went
> through the code yesterday.
Well, I'm not an
least one) from /etc and LOCALBASE/etc/ezjail.
3. What do you want to achieve.
--
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
07.03.2013 16:29, Yoann Gini пишет:
>
> Le 7 mars 2013 à 10:58, Boris Samorodov a écrit :
>
>> 07.03.2013 12:48, Yoann Gini пишет:
>>
>>> I need to share this IP, I’ve only one and I would like to avoid playing
>>> with NAT…
>>
>> One
gle overlapping IP address assigned to itself.
-
My interpratation of the mannual page is: this restrict is valid only
when ip4.addr sysctl is used. Otherwise this restriction should be
documented at other section (say, at DESCRIPTION).
--
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Com
20 matches
Mail list logo
