https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240106
Gabor ADORJANI changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugs.freebsd@gabor.ador
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240106
Bjoern A. Zeeb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@freebsd.org,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240106
--- Comment #13 from Kristof Provost ---
(In reply to Bjoern A. Zeeb from comment #12)
Note that the issue described in #10 is a configuration problem more than a
bug.
In this configuration the bridge will grab all packets, including those
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240106
--- Comment #14 from Gabor ADORJANI ---
(In reply to Kristof Provost from comment #13)
Thanks Kristof, you are right, I didn't see the forest for the trees. It's not
a bug, but a feature.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240106
cr...@rlwinm.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cr...@rlwinm.de
--- Comment #15 f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240106
--- Comment #16 from Gabor ADORJANI ---
Thanks, I'll try - I've been doing this on Linux for many years. Ironically,
some years ago I read the opposite in some FreeBSD-related doc: assigning the
addresses to the parent interface was the rec