Hello,
I recently configured a system where kern.securelevel=1 would be good, but
noticed that modules listed in kld_list in rc.conf is then not loaded.
Would it not be a good to either explicitly state that kld_list cannot be
used with kern.securelevel, or have kld run before sysctl?
Best regard
On 2018-05-18 07:04, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently configured a system where kern.securelevel=1 would be good, but
> noticed that modules listed in kld_list in rc.conf is then not loaded.
> Would it not be a good to either explicitly state that kld_list cannot be
> used with kern.
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2018-05-18 07:04, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I recently configured a system where kern.securelevel=1 would be good,
> but
> > noticed that modules listed in kld_list in rc.conf is then not loaded.
> > Would it not be a good to
[Sorry about bad headers and formatting - I took this off the archive
page]
"Fabian Freyer" wrote:
From jail(3):
The jail_getv() function takes a null-terminated list of name and
value
strings, and passes it to jail_get(2). It is the caller's
responsibility
to ensure that the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228351
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|j...@freebsd.org
--
You are receiv
