Hi,
One relatively cheap way to create thin jails in the pre-ZFS era,
was to combine nullfs and unionfs (1). This seem to work only in
10 and previous branches. Do you use such a combination?
It seems like a very relevant feature nowadays, when people
use all these cloud-based systems, which oft
Hi!
> One relatively cheap way to create thin jails in the pre-ZFS era,
> was to combine nullfs and unionfs (1). This seem to work only in
> 10 and previous branches. Do you use such a combination?
We had this running with FreeBSD 6.x, but unionfs had issues,
among them the whiteout problem.
If
Hi!
> One relatively cheap way to create thin jails in the pre-ZFS era,
> was to combine nullfs and unionfs (1). This seem to work only in
> 10 and previous branches. Do you use such a combination?
Ah, to correct myself here: We only used unionfs, not in combination
with nullfs. Can you describe
Hi Kurt,
On 02/19/2017 12:59 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Ah, to correct myself here: We only used unionfs, not in combination
with nullfs. Can you describe why nullfs with unionfs does not
work in 11 ?
It panics easily. I use the following shell script to create a working
environment:
PREFIX=/jai
Hi Kurt,
On 02/19/2017 12:56 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
We had this running with FreeBSD 6.x, but unionfs had issues,
among them the whiteout problem.
I am not sure exactly when unionfs was re-written...
Sometime during 7-CURRENT but I am not sure if everything was
backported to 6.
It seems lik