Re: jails in different private subnets on the same host

2016-05-19 Thread James Gritton
On 2016-05-18 09:08, Grzegorz Junka wrote: I just tried telnet 192.168.1.50 80 from the main host and from the 10.33.1.40 jail. From the main host it works without issues. From the jail it eventually connected after 15 or so seconds of waiting. That sounds like about the kind of timeout I'd exp

Re: jails in different private subnets on the same host

2016-05-19 Thread Grzegorz Junka
On 19/05/2016 14:50, James Gritton wrote: On 2016-05-18 09:08, Grzegorz Junka wrote: I just tried telnet 192.168.1.50 80 from the main host and from the 10.33.1.40 jail. From the main host it works without issues. From the jail it eventually connected after 15 or so seconds of waiting. That s

Re: jails in different private subnets on the same host

2016-05-19 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > Why would it need to use the nameserver if I am telneting through IP? Use telnet -N to avoid DNS lookups. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! ___ freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists

Re: jails in different private subnets on the same host

2016-05-19 Thread Ernie Luzar
James Gritton wrote: On 2016-05-18 09:08, Grzegorz Junka wrote: I just tried telnet 192.168.1.50 80 from the main host and from the 10.33.1.40 jail. From the main host it works without issues. From the jail it eventually connected after 15 or so seconds of waiting. That sounds like about the k

Re: jails in different private subnets on the same host

2016-05-19 Thread Grzegorz Junka
On 19/05/2016 15:40, Ernie Luzar wrote: James Gritton wrote: On 2016-05-18 09:08, Grzegorz Junka wrote: I just tried telnet 192.168.1.50 80 from the main host and from the 10.33.1.40 jail. From the main host it works without issues. From the jail it eventually connected after 15 or so seconds