Re: SHM objects cannot be isolated in jails, any evolution in future FreeBSD versions?

2016-03-14 Thread Mark Felder
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016, at 11:42, James Gritton wrote: > On 2016-03-12 04:05, Simon wrote: > > The shm_open()(2) function changed since FreeBSD 7.0: the SHM objects > > path are now uncorrelated from the physical file system to become just > > abstract objects. Probably due to this, the jail system

Re: SHM objects cannot be isolated in jails, any evolution in future FreeBSD versions?

2016-03-14 Thread James Gritton
On 2016-03-14 15:07, Mark Felder wrote: On Sat, Mar 12, 2016, at 11:42, James Gritton wrote: On 2016-03-12 04:05, Simon wrote: > The shm_open()(2) function changed since FreeBSD 7.0: the SHM objects > path are now uncorrelated from the physical file system to become just > abstract objects. Prob