On Sat, Jan 24, 2015, at 09:16, Ian Smith wrote:
> Excuse top-post, but the gmail header on this message was (surprisingly)
> insufficiently anonymised to disguise its origin:
>
That could very well be Joe Barbish. It could also be someone in the
same city who uses FreeBSD and likes qjails. Ei
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> Well this is a rather trendy topic of late and timely. I'm very happy to
> see a renaissance and renewed interest in container administration for
> FreeBSD.
>
>
[...]
> For years I've used and endorsed ezjail, but as stated, it is depre
> > For years I've used and endorsed ezjail, but as stated, it is depreciated.
Hmm, there's no notation at
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=sysutils&portname=ezjail ,
nor in the Makefile AFAICT.
> > For a book, excluding ezjail would exclude a huge portion of the user base
> >
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > > For years I've used and endorsed ezjail, but as stated, it is
> depreciated.
>
>
>
[...]
> Really the word most people use is "deprecated" rather than "depreciated".
>
The OP seemed well versed in the topic so I'm pretty sure the inten
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:23:48 -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
[Sean Chittenden wrote:]
> > > For years I've used and endorsed ezjail, but as stated, it is
> > > depreciated.
>
> Hmm, there's no notation at
> http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=sysutils&portname=ezjail
> ,
> nor
On 2015-01-26 22:46, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:23:48 -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> [Sean Chittenden wrote:]
> > > > For years I've used and endorsed ezjail, but as stated, it is
> depreciated.
> >
> > Hmm, there's no notation at
> >
> http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.p
