Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-05-09 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:46:57PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote: > > It's not fixed anywhere yet - it sometimes works in current, and > sometimes doesn't. I've been meaning to patch it up, but it the problem > is what I think it is, the patching up is a pretty big operation. > > It doesn't mean you

Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-05-09 Thread Jamie Gritton
On 05/09/13 03:17, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:46:57PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote: It's not fixed anywhere yet - it sometimes works in current, and sometimes doesn't. I've been meaning to patch it up, but it the problem is what I think it is, the patching up is a pretty big

RE: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-05-09 Thread Dewayne Geraghty
An ugly workaround to complete the jail closure, when relying on jail.conf, is to: jail -r $JAILNAME umount /$LOCATION_OF_JAILS/$JAILNAME/dev || true Regards, Dewayne. ___ freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo