new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-02-15 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Hello, like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8) and jail.conf capabilities. Thanks for that extension! Accidentally I saw that "devfs_ruleset" seems to be ignored. If I list /dev/ I see all the hosts disk devices etc. I set "devfs_ruleset = 4;" and "enforce_statfs = 1;"

Re: mount lag, umounting returns wrong "Device busy"

2013-02-15 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
schrieb Mateusz Guzik am 15.02.2013 17:50 (localtime): > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:43:16PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: >> Hello, >> >> while playing with new jail features, I recognized that manually >> umounting doesn't work as I'd expect. >> After jail has been destroyed, the following m

Re: new jail(8) ignoring devfs_ruleset?

2013-02-15 Thread Jamie Gritton
On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8) and jail.conf capabilities. Thanks for that extension! Accidentally I saw that "devfs_ruleset" seems to be ignored. If I list /dev/ I see all the hosts disk devices etc. I s