Hi freebsd-jail@freebsd.org,
I wanna tell you about a very solid investment I participate in
since five month. I made 510% profit by now. This is a Hong Kong traders
company, active on stock, derivatives, and Forex markets. Their performance is
very consistent, they make up to 3% daily and
Hi Dan,
Dan Naumov wrote:
> So, I want the basejail to only contain the world and link the ports
> tree from the host into each individual jail when it's time to update
> the ports inside them, but I am running into a bit of a bizarre issue:
> I can mount_nullfs /usr/ports elsewhere on the host j
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Dan Naumov wrote:
>> So, I want the basejail to only contain the world and link the ports
>> tree from the host into each individual jail when it's time to update
>> the ports inside them, but I am running into a bit of a bizarre is
So, I want the basejail to only contain the world and link the ports
tree from the host into each individual jail when it's time to update
the ports inside them, but I am running into a bit of a bizarre issue:
I can mount_nullfs /usr/ports elsewhere on the host just fine, but it
doesn't work if I t
Old Synopsis: sysinstall and sade can access host's disks from within a jail
New Synopsis: [jail] sysinstall and sade can access host's disks from within a
jail
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-jail
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Apr 6 23:18:07 UTC
Synopsis: [jail] sysinstall and sade can access host's disks from within a jail
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: delphij
State-Changed-When: Wed Apr 7 00:55:02 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why:
Dear submitter,
By default, FreeBSD applies a devfs rule called "jail" if the jail
is
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Dan Naumov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Dan Naumov wrote:
>>> So, I want the basejail to only contain the world and link the ports
>>> tree from the host into each individual jail when it's time to update
>>> the por
>> An additional question: how come "sade" and "sysinstall" which are run
>> inside the jail can see (and I can only assume they can also operate
>> on and damage) the real underlying disks of the host?
>>
>
> Disks (as well as others you have in your host's /dev) aren't visible
> inside jails.
We
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Dan Naumov wrote:
>>> An additional question: how come "sade" and "sysinstall" which are run
>>> inside the jail can see (and I can only assume they can also operate
>>> on and damage) the real underlying disks of the host?
>>>
>>
>> Disks (as well as others you hav