> On 23 Dec 2022, at 15:27, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>
> On 12/23/22, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 16 Dec 2022, at 16:29, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/16/22, Zhenlei Huang wrote:
Hi,
While hacking `sys/kern/kern_jail.c` I got lost.
There're lots
On 12/23/22, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>
>
>> On 16 Dec 2022, at 16:29, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>>
>> On 12/16/22, Zhenlei Huang wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> While hacking `sys/kern/kern_jail.c` I got lost.
>>>
>>> There're lots of ref / unref and flags to prevent visit invalid prison
>>> while
>>> c
> On 16 Dec 2022, at 16:29, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>
> On 12/16/22, Zhenlei Huang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> While hacking `sys/kern/kern_jail.c` I got lost.
>>
>> There're lots of ref / unref and flags to prevent visit invalid prison
>> while
>> concurrent modification is possible and some refs loo
On 2022-12-16 06:41, Zhenlei Huang wrote:
While hacking `sys/kern/kern_jail.c` I got lost.
There're lots of ref / unref and flags to prevent visit invalid prison
while
concurrent modification is possible and some refs looks weird.
Is it possible to employ epoch(9) to simplify managing of p
On 12/16/22, Zhenlei Huang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While hacking `sys/kern/kern_jail.c` I got lost.
>
> There're lots of ref / unref and flags to prevent visit invalid prison
> while
> concurrent modification is possible and some refs looks weird.
>
> Is it possible to employ epoch(9) to simplify managi
Hi,
While hacking `sys/kern/kern_jail.c` I got lost.
There're lots of ref / unref and flags to prevent visit invalid prison while
concurrent modification is possible and some refs looks weird.
Is it possible to employ epoch(9) to simplify managing of prison lifecycle ?
Best regards,
Zhenlei
