https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229968
Edward Tomasz Napierala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||247219
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229968
james changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamesmathu669...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229968
--- Comment #7 from Shawn Webb ---
(In reply to Bjoern A. Zeeb from comment #6)
A workaround would be to use epair devices with jails. It would be nice to be
on par with Solaris Crossbow and Zones with complete jail isolation. Making
epair
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229968
--- Comment #6 from Bjoern A. Zeeb ---
(In reply to Jamie Gritton from comment #3)
There is a point that we should zero the statistics for non-IPs for queries
from jails to not leak that information (as so many other things) and then only
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229968
--- Comment #5 from Bjoern A. Zeeb ---
(In reply to Jason Mader from comment #4)
that is a totally different issue; that's using a hack badly; sorry. Classic
jails don't care about interfaces (as Jamie said) and the hack to do the
provis
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229968
--- Comment #4 from Jason Mader ---
(In reply to Jamie Gritton from comment #3)
There is an odd behavior with IP aliases. If two jails use the same address,
first {
interface = ix0;
ip4.addr = 192.0.2.1;
}
second {
interface = ix0;
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229968
Jamie Gritton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ja...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229968
Shawn Webb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shawn.w...@hardenedbsd.org
--- Commen
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229968
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|j...@freebsd.org
--
You are receiv
