O. Hartmann wrote:
> > If reverting this does not help, can you try with:
> > sysctl vfs.cache_fast_lookup=0
>
> reverting the mentioned commit helped and made things working as expected
> again.
>
> Thank you very much.
Sorry looks like bsd.links.mk expects full paths.
Can you confirm the bel
Le 2016-03-15 09:34, Miroslav Lachman a écrit :
Mark Felder wrote on 03/14/2016 22:07:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016, at 11:42, James Gritton wrote:
On 2016-03-12 04:05, Simon wrote:
The shm_open()(2) function changed since FreeBSD 7.0: the SHM
objects
path are now uncorrelated from the physical
don't know why. Is this planned, or are
there any greater plans ongoing also involving IPC's similar issue?
Thank you by advance for your answers!
Simon.
___
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
proach that is currently the only way to use the newer features.
Just reading /etc/rc.d/jail is IMO good proof of this...
> It's clear now that this won't be happening in 9.0. So none of this is in
> danger of getting pushed through in a hurry.
I really hope
Synopsis: [jail] [patch] devfs is mounted in jails without rules if devfs.rules
can't be parsed
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-jail->simon
Responsible-Changed-By: simon
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Dec 2 07:35:04 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Grab PR to make sure it get de
gt; >>
> >> Any objections or better ideas out there?
>
> > I think the best way at this moment is to revert the change ( I can do
> > that , or someone else, I dont mind ) and think of a better concept. Simon
> > also mentioned that he didn't like the cur
use the jails for
security isolation as the jail root would likely be able to perform a
symlink attack. I haven't every actually looked at how it could be
done, but installworld isn't make to be "secure" against such things.
--
Simon L. Nielsen
___
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Personally I have been very happy with ezjail, and I think having a
script like that "externally" is a much better way to go. If that
means importing ezjail or making something like it I don't know.
--
Simon L. Nielsen
___
freebsd-jail@fre
ystem should take, but having ezjail like functionality in
base would be a good thing IMO.
Personally I also have a rather strong dislike for the jail auto ip
setting feature, but as people are using it removing the functionality
will cause pain.
--
Simon L. Nielsen
___
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ce to have it in FreeBSD 7.1 RELEASE?
As the patch hasn't been commited yet to -CURRENT, having it in 7.1 is
somewhat unlikely. Somebody need to take an interest first...
--
Simon L. Nielsen
___
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
his patch has been running since without problems on sky.FreeBSD.org
(which hosts the FreeBSD wiki and more):
6:07PM up 5 days, 49 mins, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.05, 0.07
--
Simon L. Nielsen
___
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
11 matches
Mail list logo
