On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 01:43:59AM +0900, kikuc...@uranus.dti.ne.jp wrote:
> > I only briefly looked at the patch. The fact that you perform outside of
> > ipcperm looks suspicious but may be harmless, so at best it's a bad
> > style. If you need ipc mechanism-specifc functions, make them call
> >
Hi Mateusz,
Thank you for your reply.
(and sorry about my ISP mail service jammed...)
I still want to resolve sysv ipc confilicts between jails somehow.
(It's welcome if someone else do, but I couldn't find any working example
yet...)
> I only briefly looked at the patch. The fact that you per
