Re: jail still broken on 9-STABLE

2012-05-15 Thread Christer Solskogen
On 15/5/2012 4:58 PM, Mark Felder wrote: On Tue, 15 May 2012 09:23:38 -0500, Christer Solskogen wrote: I don't quite understand what you mean about that. Does it mean that you have fixed it or that you will fix it sometime in the future? It's not scheduled to be pushed into 9-STABLE (MFC'd)

Re: jail still broken on 9-STABLE

2012-05-15 Thread Mark Felder
On Tue, 15 May 2012 09:23:38 -0500, Christer Solskogen wrote: I don't quite understand what you mean about that. Does it mean that you have fixed it or that you will fix it sometime in the future? It's not scheduled to be pushed into 9-STABLE (MFC'd) for quite a while.

Re: jail still broken on 9-STABLE

2012-05-15 Thread Christer Solskogen
On 15/5/2012 3:48 PM, Jamie Gritton wrote: I gave a pretty long MFC period to the new jail stuff since it's such a big change. I don't quite understand what you mean about that. Does it mean that you have fixed it or that you will fix it sometime in the future? -- chs _

Re: jail still broken on 9-STABLE

2012-05-15 Thread Jamie Gritton
I gave a pretty long MFC period to the new jail stuff since it's such a big change. - Jamie On 05/15/12 03:09, Christer Solskogen wrote: jail: unknown parameter: allow.nomount :-( ___ freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/m

jail still broken on 9-STABLE

2012-05-15 Thread Christer Solskogen
jail: unknown parameter: allow.nomount :-( ___ freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"