Re: New jail(8) committed

2012-04-28 Thread Devin Teske
On Apr 28, 2012, at 3:52 PM, Jamie Gritton wrote: > I don't know about wrapping a utility around it, but it would be nice to > have in a library. If it could be made to work for not only jail, but > apmd and devd as well, then we could make some existing code cleaner. > I'm thinking about throw

Re: New jail(8) committed

2012-04-28 Thread Jason Hellenthal
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 04:59:51PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote: > On 04/28/12 00:08, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 06:14:07AM +0200, Dirk Engling wrote: > >> On 26.04.12 22:07, Jamie Gritton wrote: > >> > >>> I've finally put my jail(8) changes into HEAD. This new version of

Re: New jail(8) committed

2012-04-28 Thread Jamie Gritton
On 04/28/12 00:08, Jason Hellenthal wrote: On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 06:14:07AM +0200, Dirk Engling wrote: On 26.04.12 22:07, Jamie Gritton wrote: I've finally put my jail(8) changes into HEAD. This new version of jail can create jails from a configuration file - see jail.conf(5) for the format

Re: New jail(8) committed

2012-04-28 Thread Jamie Gritton
I don't know about wrapping a utility around it, but it would be nice to have in a library. If it could be made to work for not only jail, but apmd and devd as well, then we could make some existing code cleaner. - Jamie On 04/28/12 10:52, Devin Teske wrote: On Apr 28, 2012, at 7:38 AM, Jamie

Re: New jail(8) committed

2012-04-28 Thread Devin Teske
On Apr 28, 2012, at 7:38 AM, Jamie Gritton wrote: > The main reason I didn't consider a jail.d approach is just that I > haven't - such things are a little off the radar for me. It seemed very > natural to use a configuration file format that other programs already > use (e.g. named, apmd, devd).

Re: New jail(8) committed

2012-04-28 Thread Jamie Gritton
The main reason I didn't consider a jail.d approach is just that I haven't - such things are a little off the radar for me. It seemed very natural to use a configuration file format that other programs already use (e.g. named, apmd, devd). I suppose it's true that the "foo.d" approach is also in u

Re: New jail(8) committed

2012-04-28 Thread Dirk Engling
On 28.04.12 08:08, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > Since when does a lack of a parser in "YOUR tool" become a problem for > FreeBSD ? just sayin! I mixed a reply to Bjoern A. Zeeb's question about ezjail supporting the config format in into the remarks I had about the general design decisions. Of