Re: kern/128902: [ipfw] ipfw allow tcp from any to any established allow Sync pass through

2008-11-16 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: ipfw allow tcp from any to any established allow Sync pass through New Synopsis: [ipfw] ipfw allow tcp from any to any established allow Sync pass through Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-ipfw Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Nov 16 08:

Re: some ipfw filter does not function under Release 6.3

2008-11-16 Thread Jin Guojun[VFF]
Ian Smith wrote: On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Jin Guojun[VFF] wrote: >I think this is a bug in ipfw because after change the rule order, the >problem persists: >0056626 3090 deny ip from 221.192.199.36 to any >65330 2018 983473 allow tcp from any to any established >65535

Re: some ipfw filter does not function under Release 6.3

2008-11-16 Thread Jin Guojun[VFF]
Ian Smith wrote: On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Jin Guojun[VFF] wrote: >I think this is a bug in ipfw because after change the rule order, the >problem persists: >0056626 3090 deny ip from 221.192.199.36 to any >65330 2018 983473 allow tcp from any to any established >65535

Re: kern/128902: [ipfw] ipfw allow tcp from any to any established allow Sync pass through

2008-11-16 Thread linimon
Synopsis: [ipfw] ipfw allow tcp from any to any established allow Sync pass through State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: linimon State-Changed-When: Mon Nov 17 02:46:08 UTC 2008 State-Changed-Why: Closed at submitter's request. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=128902

Re: some ipfw filter does not function under Release 6.3

2008-11-16 Thread Ian Smith
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, Jin Guojun[VFF] wrote: > Ian Smith wrote: > > > On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Jin Guojun[VFF] wrote: > > > > >I think this is a bug in ipfw because after change the rule order, the > > >problem persists: > > >0056626 3090 deny ip from 221.192.199.36 to any

Re: some ipfw filter does not function under Release 6.3

2008-11-16 Thread Jin Guojun[VFF]
Ian Smith wrote: On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, Jin Guojun[VFF] wrote: > Ian Smith wrote: > > > On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Jin Guojun[VFF] wrote: > > > > >I think this is a bug in ipfw because after change the rule order, the > > >problem persists: > > >0056626 3090 deny ip from 221.192.1