Hello elaconta.com,
Thursday, July 27, 2006, 2:03:26 AM, you wrote:
> Tony Abou-Assaleh wrote:
>> I would like to see a reference that shows that it is not possible to have
>> two networks with the same subnet IP ranges. In fact, your working linux
>> PC is a good example that it can be done.
>>
> U have two simply solutions, and one a little more complicated
> 1. use bridge, ho suggest someoane
> 2. if dont' wnat to change network configuration, then change part
> from firewall to hub or modem or what u have. For example
> modem 10.1.1.1 <> 10.1.1.2 firewall (freebsd 6.1)
>
Hi,
I've recently installed FreeBSD on a Soekris Net 4801 to act as my
LAN's router. I have got natd and ipfw working fine (there was
originally some trouble with getting an IP from NTL via dhcp because I
hadn't allowed the cable modem's ip to talk to the router, or NTL's
dhcp servers to also tal
Thanks for the tips everyone. I've thought about the subject and i'm
going to use a bridge to solve the problem. As it is, we're nat'ing
something that is already nat'ed (our router already hands out
addresses in the 192.168.1.x range). Therefore, we're going with the
bridge, even if it means recon
Hi,
[ipfw]
# check if incoming packets belong to a natted session, allow through if
add 01000 divert natd ip from any to any in via sis0
add 01001 check-state
Default behavior of ipfw is to *BLOCK EVERY PACKET* if you did not say
in your kernel-config "options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT.
T
Hello!
I've noticed some changes in ipfw, as follows:
RELEASE-5.4:
# ipfw pipe 1 config bw 64Kbit/s
# ipfw pipe 2 config bw 512Kbit/s
# ipfw pipe 3 config bw 512Kbit/s mask dst-ip 0xfffc
# ipfw pipe show
1: 64.000 Kbit/s0 ms 50 sl. 0 queues (1 buckets) droptail
mask: 0x00 0x
Hello Adam,
Friday, July 28, 2006, 2:12:32 PM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> I've recently installed FreeBSD on a Soekris Net 4801 to act as my
> LAN's router. I have got natd and ipfw working fine (there was
> originally some trouble with getting an IP from NTL via dhcp because I
> hadn't allowed the cabl
