On Sun, Dec 20, 2015, at 00:36, Graham Menhennitt wrote:
> On 25/11/2015 16:00, Graham Menhennitt wrote:
> > Hello IPFWers,
> >
> > I have a box running FreeBSD 10-stable that I use as a
> > router/firewall/NAT. It runs IPFW and uses kernel NAT. My son is nagging
> > me about playing multi-player
On 25/11/2015 16:00, Graham Menhennitt wrote:
> Hello IPFWers,
>
> I have a box running FreeBSD 10-stable that I use as a
> router/firewall/NAT. It runs IPFW and uses kernel NAT. My son is nagging
> me about playing multi-player online games on his Sony PS4.
>
> From what I've read, I could enable
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 12:03:21 +1100, Graham Menhennitt wrote:
> On 28/11/2015 20:47, Thomás S. Bregolin wrote:
> > Besides the redirect_port option, you still need rules allowing traffic
> > in to those ports. Excuse-me if you've done that already (I have no way
> > of knowing).
> >
> >
> > S
On 28/11/2015 20:47, Thomás S. Bregolin wrote:
> Besides the redirect_port option, you still need rules allowing traffic
> in to those ports. Excuse-me if you've done that already (I have no way
> of knowing).
>
>
> Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 03:19:09PM +1100, Graham Menhennitt:
>> On 28/11/2015 05:03, T
On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:19:09 +1100, Graham Menhennitt wrote:
> On 28/11/2015 05:03, Thomas wrote:
> > Aren't your regular NAT rules in NAT instance 1? That command will
> > overwrite those and leave just the new ones.
> >
> > If that's the case, you can put those rules in a different NAT insta
Hello,
Besides the redirect_port option, you still need rules allowing traffic
in to those ports. Excuse-me if you've done that already (I have no way
of knowing).
I'd suggest forwarding one or all of those ports to another host, and
testing with netcat in order to rule out problems with the PS4
On 28/11/2015 05:03, Thomas wrote:
> Aren't your regular NAT rules in NAT instance 1? That command will
> overwrite those and leave just the new ones.
>
> If that's the case, you can put those rules in a different NAT instance,
> or add them to the rest of your NAT rules.
>
>
> Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at
Aren't your regular NAT rules in NAT instance 1? That command will
overwrite those and leave just the new ones.
If that's the case, you can put those rules in a different NAT instance,
or add them to the rest of your NAT rules.
As to the risk, given the security history of UPnP, this kind of sta
Hello IPFWers,
I have a box running FreeBSD 10-stable that I use as a
router/firewall/NAT. It runs IPFW and uses kernel NAT. My son is nagging
me about playing multi-player online games on his Sony PS4.
>From what I've read, I could enable UPnP. But I've tried compiling the
net/miniupnpd port but
