[Bug 288380] ipfw libalias: Implementation of a simple NAT configuration for MAP-E (RFC 7597)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=288380 Tatsuki Makino changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu

[Bug 288380] ipfw libalias: Implementation of a simple NAT configuration for MAP-E (RFC 7597)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=288380 --- Comment #2 from Tatsuki Makino --- Created attachment 262482 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=262482&action=edit patch for experimentation It seems that using the skipto action as a dynamic rule should not be d

[Bug 245381] ipfw protocol or-block parsing bug when ip protocol is first in list

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245381 Tatsuki Makino changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tatsuki_mak...@hotmail.com --- Co

[Bug 283709] ipfw OR block does not work as expected

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283709 Tatsuki Makino changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tatsuki_mak...@hotmail.com --- Co

[Bug 288380] ipfw libalias: Implementation of a simple NAT configuration for MAP-E (RFC 7597)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=288380 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org -- You are receiv

[Bug 288322] ipfw: failed to configure port_range for NAT

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=288322 Tatsuki Makino changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||288380 Referenced Bugs: https:/

[Bug 263240] IPFW tools: Parsing error in nat config port_range

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263240 Tatsuki Makino changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||288380 Referenced Bugs: https:/

[Bug 263240] IPFW tools: Parsing error in nat config port_range

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263240 Vyacheslav changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #261503|0 |1 is patch|

[Bug 263240] IPFW tools: Parsing error in nat config port_range

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263240 Tatsuki Makino changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tatsuki_mak...@hotmail.com --- Co

[Bug 288322] ipfw: failed to configure port_range for NAT

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=288322 Tatsuki Makino changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Closed Resolution|---

[Bug 226642] ipfw me4 equivalant

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226642 Tatsuki Makino changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tatsuki_mak...@hotmail.com --- Co

[Bug 288322] ipfw: failed to configure port_range for NAT

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=288322 --- Comment #2 from Tatsuki Makino --- Created attachment 262308 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=262308&action=edit patch for sbin/ipfw/nat.c of main This patch seems more appropriate than my comment #0. Since the

[Bug 288322] ipfw: failed to configure port_range for NAT

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=288322 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Assignee|b...@freeb

[Bug 263240] IPFW tools: Parsing error in nat config port_range

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263240 --- Comment #7 from Vyacheslav --- Created attachment 261503 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=261503&action=edit fix for port range parsing (2) The patch from the attachment solved the problem of parsing the port r

[Bug 93815] Add the ability to save ipfw rules to rc.d/ipfw and rc.d/ip6fw.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93815 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events Statu

[Bug 287281] ipfw man page never defines table-name

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=287281 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org -- You are receiv

[Bug 93815] Add the ability to save ipfw rules to rc.d/ipfw and rc.d/ip6fw.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93815 Zane C. Bowers-Hadley changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vve...@vvelox.net --- Comme

[Bug 93815] Add the ability to save ipfw rules to rc.d/ipfw and rc.d/ip6fw.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93815 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i...@freebsd.org --- Comment #10 fro

[Bug 280390] NPTv6 not working

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280390 --- Comment #24 from Tatsuki Makino --- (In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #22 & #23) > I still doesn't understand your problem. Me too :) As a result of being stingy with the money I pay upstream (removing services like phone a

[Bug 280390] NPTv6 not working

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280390 --- Comment #23 from Andrey V. Elsukov --- (In reply to Tatsuki Makino from comment #21) > The results of ipfw -D show indicated that more than 2 packets were captured > due to the ipv6-icmp rule, this patch may be meaningful :) When you

[Bug 280390] NPTv6 not working

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280390 --- Comment #22 from Andrey V. Elsukov --- I still doesn't understand your problem. NPTv6 is stateless and doesn't need any keep-state rules. We use NPTv6 many years and it works as is without any patches. -- You are receiving this mail b

[Bug 280390] NPTv6 not working

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280390 --- Comment #21 from Tatsuki Makino --- (In reply to Tatsuki Makino from comment #20) In the end, I came back to the method of using this :) I wanted to keep one_pass enabled, so I used a strange method with dynamic rules, but with the fol

[Bug 286122] ipfw in-kernel nat log not working as expected

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=286122 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org -- You are receiv

[Bug 280390] NPTv6 not working

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280390 --- Comment #20 from Tatsuki Makino --- (In reply to Tatsuki Makino from comment #19) An example of my comment #19 is a bad example. There is no problem with the communication of the created dynamic rules. However, if a packet that passes

[Bug 280390] NPTv6 not working

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280390 Tatsuki Makino changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tatsuki_mak...@hotmail.com --- Co

[Bug 263240] IPFW tools: Parsing error in nat config port_range

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263240 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #258037|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 263240] IPFW tools: Parsing error in nat config port_range

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263240 Eugene Perevyazko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@dnepro.net --- Comment #6

[Bug 285066] Kernel panic during ipfw rules related to ta_lookup_radix function

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=285066 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org Keywords

[Bug 263240] IPFW tools: Parsing error in nat config port_range

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263240 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #233165|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 213154] allow ipfw nat single pass with ipfw netgraph multi pass

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213154 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #175361|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 222768] ipfw can't distinguish an inbound packets forwarded via if_bridge

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222768 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #186898|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 137232] [ipfw] parser troubles

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137232 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org -- You are receiv

[Bug 216297] ipf fails to parse colon tcp port range operator

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216297 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugmeis...@freebsd.org --- Comment

[Bug 216610] TCP connections stuck forever in FIN_WAIT2 using IPFW

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216610 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugmeis...@freebsd.org --- Comment

[Bug 224730] ipfw dyn_keepalive sends a strange packet

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224730 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events Stat

[Bug 212143] ipfw fwd does not work if defaultgateway is tun while reconnecting

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212143 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugmeis...@freebsd.org --- Comment

[Bug 284691] ipfw table value corruption (addr table and flow table)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284691 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|i...@freebsd.org|a...@freebsd.org Flags

[Bug 284691] ipfw table value corruption (addr table and flow table)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284691 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |In Progress CC|

[Bug 210408] Problem with outgoing traffic using ipfw and kernel nat originated from local address

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210408 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugmeis...@freebsd.org --- Comment

[Bug 284691] ipfw table value corruption (addr table and flow table)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284691 --- Comment #1 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=95ab7b3223c08cf48ccf764815523ea995a7ea0e commit 95ab7b3223c08cf48ccf764815523ea995a7ea0e Author:

[Bug 284691] ipfw table value corruption (addr table and flow table)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=284691 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org -- You are receiv

[Bug 197648] ipfw reass ineffective after upgrade to 10.1

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197648 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Closed Assignee|i...@free

[Bug 202802] ipf reports error with broken rule, but places malformed rule anyway

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202802 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugmeis...@freebsd.org --- Comment

[Bug 216719] panic: ipfw_check_frame: unknown retval - while trying to ipfw nat incoming packet without translation state (can be L2 firewall related)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216719 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|i...@freebsd.org|bugmeis...@freebsd.org Reso

[Bug 283970] netpfil/ipfw: Fix wrong indent number to dump ctl3_handlers

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283970 Andrey V. Elsukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@freebsd.org Ass

[Bug 283970] netpfil/ipfw: Fix wrong indent number to dump ctl3_handlers

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283970 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[PATCH] netpfil/ipfw: Fix |netpfil/ipfw: Fix wrong

[Bug 283783] ipfw parser does not handle src-port keyword

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283783 Jim B. changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|Closed Resolution|---

[Bug 283783] ipfw parser does not handle src-port keyword

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283783 Mark Johnston changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Open CC|

[Bug 283783] ipfw parser does not handle src-port keyword

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283783 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org -- You are receiv

[Bug 283709] ipfw OR block does not work as expected

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283709 --- Comment #2 from Michael --- (In reply to kudzu from comment #1) root@floc:~ # ipfw add 15 deny udp from { not 'table(0)' and not 'table(3)' } to a.a.a.a in recv hn3 ipfw: missing ")" root@floc:~ # ipfw add 15 deny udp from { not 'tab

[Bug 283709] ipfw OR block does not work as expected

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283709 kudzu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ku...@tenebras.com --- Comment #1 from kud

[Bug 283709] ipfw OR block does not work as expected

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283709 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org -- You are receiv

[Bug 248254] /etc/rc.d/ipfw should support ipdivert_enable="YES"

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248254 Alexander Vereeken changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch | -- You are receiving this m

[Bug 238657] netpfil: ipfw: replace D with DX in ip_dn_glue.c

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238657 Alexander Vereeken changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch | -- You are receiving this m

[Bug 219316] Wildcard matching of ipfw flow tables

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219316 Alexander Vereeken changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch | -- You are receiving this m

[Bug 232764] [ipfw] share/examples/ipfw/change_rules.sh: Support firewall_type=workstation, don't backup or send e-mail if no differences found

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232764 Alexander Vereeken changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch | -- You are receiving this m

[Bug 217618] Enhance hash function in ip_fw_table_algo.c for flow:hash

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217618 Alexander Vereeken changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch | -- You are receiving this m

[Bug 222768] ipfw can't distinguish an inbound packets forwarded via if_bridge

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222768 Alexander Vereeken changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch | -- You are receiving this m

[Bug 167822] start script doesn't load firewall_type if set in rc.conf.d/ipfw

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167822 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[ipfw] start script doesn't |start script doesn't load

[Bug 184355] rc.firewall: ipfw failed to restart if tables are used

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184355 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[rc.firewall] ipfw failed |rc.firewall: ipfw failed to

[Bug 184355] [rc.firewall] ipfw failed to restart if tables are used

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184355 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org --- Comment #4 fro

[Bug 283248] IPFW: document table behaviour vs. IPv4/IPv6

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283248 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org -- You are receiv

[Bug 167822] [ipfw] start script doesn't load firewall_type if set in rc.conf.d/ipfw

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167822 Alexander Vereeken changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch | CC|

[Bug 213154] allow ipfw nat single pass with ipfw netgraph multi pass

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213154 Alexander Vereeken changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch | Summary|[patch] a

[Bug 282507] ipfw: vnet_destroy causes exclusive rw IPFW UH lock (IPFW UH lock) r = 0 (0xfffffe0140b796d0) locked

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=282507 Lexi Winter changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||vimage -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug 282507] ipfw: vnet_destroy causes exclusive rw IPFW UH lock (IPFW UH lock) r = 0 (0xfffffe0140b796d0) locked

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=282507 Bug ID: 282507 Summary: ipfw: vnet_destroy causes exclusive rw IPFW UH lock (IPFW UH lock) r = 0 (0xfe0140b796d0) locked Product: Base System Version: 15.0-CURRENT

[Bug 127230] [ipfw] Feature request to add UID and/or GID logging data to ipfw logging with uid rules.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127230 Alexander Vereeken changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch | CC|

[Bug 282075] ipfw: -n switch is broken

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=282075 --- Comment #4 from rx5...@gmail.com --- Yes, you're right, -n works as it should, but _it_says_ as it does not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 282075] ipfw: -n switch is broken

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=282075 --- Comment #3 from Andrey V. Elsukov --- (In reply to rx5670 from comment #2) > Are these ok? These commands do nothing with your rules. You can check, there is no table 19 and rule was not deleted. I agree, there is some confusing messag

[Bug 282075] ipfw: -n switch is broken

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=282075 --- Comment #2 from rx5...@gmail.com --- Are these ok? [root@vt ~]# ipfw -n table 19 add 10.10.10.10 ipfw: DEPRECATED: inserting data into non-existent table 19. (auto-created) ignored: 10.10.10.10/32 0 [root@vt ~]# ipfw -n delete 65530 i

[Bug 282075] ipfw: -n switch is broken

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=282075 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org -- You are receiv

[Bug 217618] Enhance hash function in ip_fw_table_algo.c for flow:hash

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217618 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|don...@freebsd.org |i...@freebsd.org --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug 219316] Wildcard matching of ipfw flow tables

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219316 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added CC|i...@freebsd.org| Assignee|don...@freebsd.

[Bug 263240] IPFW tools: Parsing error in nat config port_range

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263240 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|don...@freebsd.org |i...@freebsd.org CC

[Bug 232764] [ipfw] share/examples/ipfw/change_rules.sh: Support firewall_type=workstation, don't backup or send e-mail if no differences found

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232764 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|mfc-stable12?, | |mfc-stable11?

[Bug 280390] NPTv6 not working

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280390 --- Comment #18 from cnba...@gmail.com --- (In reply to John Hay from comment #17) Yes, ndproxy_uplink_ipv6_addresses="fe80::fc00:5ff:fe07:578d" and ndproxy_downlink_mac_address="fe:00:05:07:57:8d" are both set in rc.conf When I use `pi

[Bug 280390] NPTv6 not working

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280390 --- Comment #17 from John Hay --- Looking at a previous tcpdump, did you also change the link local to: ndproxy_uplink_ipv6_addresses="fe80::fc00:5ff:fe07:578d" and the mac address, I think, but not 100% sure about the first byte (fe), to

[Bug 280390] NPTv6 not working

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280390 --- Comment #16 from cnba...@gmail.com --- (In reply to John Hay from comment #15) thanks for your testing. I fully copied these configurations and replaced with the mac address of vtnet0, ping6 failed on server and client. replaced with t

[Bug 280390] NPTv6 not working

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280390 --- Comment #15 from John Hay --- I have made a test setup with roughly your setup, but added the ndproxy port, and added this to my rc.conf: ndproxy_enable="YES" ndproxy_uplink_interface="vtnet0" # mac and link-local address of upstream

[Bug 280390] NPTv6 not working

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280390 Bjoern A. Zeeb changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |i...@freebsd.org

[Bug 108589] rtsol(8) fails due to default ipfw rules

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108589 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org -- You are receiv

[Bug 278088] ipfw missing options for some useful IPv6 features for RFC 4890

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278088 Andrey V. Elsukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@freebsd.org Ass

[Bug 278059] Kernel panic in ipfw_chk starting in FreeBSD 14

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278059 --- Comment #2 from Nick Johnson --- I can confirm that disabling layer-2 filtering in ipfw seems to eliminate this crash. The system in question has been up for 46 days now, when previously it was crashing after just a few days. -- You

[Bug 263078] kernel core generated from ipfw_chk() function

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263078 --- Comment #8 from Zhenlei Huang --- *** Bug 278389 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 263078] kernel core generated from ipfw_chk() function

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263078 Zhenlei Huang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||z...@freebsd.org --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug 263078] kernel core generated from ipfw_chk() function

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263078 keerthana changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkeer...@cisco.com --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 278088] ipfw missing options for some useful IPv6 features for RFC 4890

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278088 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org -- You are receiv

[Bug 278039] ipfw: can't add the address ::/128 to a table

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278039 --- Comment #2 from Joshua Kinard --- Looking at it a bit more, I think this is related to Bug #226688, where you can't add IPv4 255.255.255.255 to a table, either: > # ipfw set 2 table test1 create > # ipfw set 2 table test1 add 255.255.25

[Bug 278039] ipfw: can't add the address ::/128 to a table

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278039 --- Comment #1 from Joshua Kinard --- (In reply to Lexi Winter from comment #0) It also fails when trying to add just plain "::", w/o the CIDR prefix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 278059] Kernel panic in ipfw_chk starting in FreeBSD 14

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278059 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org Keywords

[Bug 278039] ipfw: can't add the address ::/128 to a table

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278039 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|i...@freebsd.org -- You are receiv

[Bug 276732] IPFW keep-state rules with untag do not go through parent rule cmd

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276732 John Baldwin changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|i...@freebsd.org|j...@freebsd.org Flags

[Bug 276732] IPFW keep-state rules with untag do not go through parent rule cmd

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276732 --- Comment #8 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=62b1faa3b7495de22a3225e42dabe6ce8c371e86 commit 62b1faa3b7495de22a3225e42dabe6ce8c371e86 Author:

[Bug 276732] IPFW keep-state rules with untag do not go through parent rule cmd

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276732 --- Comment #7 from fodillemlinka...@gmail.com --- (In reply to John Baldwin from comment #5) Since this was work founded by my employer XipLink Inc. might as well use my work email: k...@xiplink.com Thanks. -- You are receiving this mai

[Bug 276732] IPFW keep-state rules with untag do not go through parent rule cmd

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276732 --- Comment #6 from fodillemlinka...@gmail.com --- (In reply to John Baldwin from comment #5) Please use Karim Fodil-Lemelin Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 276732] IPFW keep-state rules with untag do not go through parent rule cmd

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276732 --- Comment #5 from John Baldwin --- (In reply to fodillemlinkarim from comment #3) Do you have a full name you'd like me to use as the author of the git commit for this fix? So far what I would use is "Karim " -- You are receiving this

[Bug 276732] IPFW keep-state rules with untag do not go through parent rule cmd

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276732 --- Comment #4 from Andrey V. Elsukov --- (In reply to John Baldwin from comment #2) I agree. I just hope the change will not become a big surprise for someone when it start to work :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 276732] IPFW keep-state rules with untag do not go through parent rule cmd

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276732 --- Comment #3 from fodillemlinka...@gmail.com --- Fine by me, the break and match were left there to stay consistent with other parts of the that file that behave in a similar fashion, for example the O_COUNT and O_SKIPTO cases. -- You ar

[Bug 276732] IPFW keep-state rules with untag do not go through parent rule cmd

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276732 John Baldwin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Open --- Comment #2 from John Baldw

[Bug 276732] IPFW keep-state rules with untag do not go through parent rule cmd

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276732 John Baldwin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@freebsd.org,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >