Unix Users list

the right person in your organization. Best Regards, David Thomas To opt out,please response Exit. ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: How to use IPFW to filter routing

Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 06:52:58PM +0100, Rakor: > Hi and thanks for your reply! Hello! Sorry for not following up, I was busy and forgot. > I also tried it using recv and xmit rules. > [...] > So to me it looks like he does not know that the packet will be transmitted > via igb2 at the moment it

Re: force all the network traffic through a proxy server.

Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 01:48:30PM -0400, Ataro via freebsd-ipfw: > Hi there, > > I've set up a FreeBSD machine inside a VirtualBox machine and used IPFW to > redirect all the requests to the internet through a squid proxy server > running on the same machine in port 3128 in intercept mode (also kn

Re: connecting a PS4 via IPFW

is kind of static port forwarding might be more secure. Redirect only the necessary ports and don't worry about it. Or isolate the PS4 in a DMZ, if you're concerned it could be used as a point of entry into your network. Cheers, Thomas Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 04:00:12PM +1100, Graham Menhenn

Re: Kernel Update / IPFW not working

On 06/03/2011 14:23, Dave Johnson wrote: An IPFW problem when going from release to stable on 8.2 An help gladly accepted LOG ON Flushed all rules. 00010 allow ip from 127.0.0.1 to 127.0.0.1 via lo0 00030 divert 8668 ip from any to any via bge0 ipfw: getsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument 500

Re: kern/148928: [ipfw] Problem with loading of ipfw NAT rules during system startup

The following reply was made to PR kern/148928; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Thomas Sandford To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, fmy...@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/148928: [ipfw] Problem with loading of ipfw NAT rules during system startup Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:24:39 +0100 The

Re: IPFW+Dummynet Capability

sure if it was ever commited to -stable or -head. Regards, Thomas Vogt ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: kern/103454: [ipfw] [patch] add a facility to modify DF bit of the IP packet

pretty useless if these patches > would hang in GNATS forever. I hope someone will commit it. DSCP/TOS feature in ipfw is pretty useful if you're doing VOIP or QoS in generell. The days where ISPs don't do QoS because they do erything with "over-provesioning" are over. Most

Re: ipfw Unrecognised option

packets, an interface name can only be used as: 'recv|xmit|via ifXXX' Thomas ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Problem with firewall and the ports

your complete ruleset. Thomas ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: NAT question

ny in recv fxp0 ipfw add divert natd all from 192.168.1.1/32 to any out xmit fxp0 Thomas ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

blocking dhcp requests

length: 351 the dhcp server sends the client an answer, even though ipfw seems to reject the packet. Is there any way to block the dhcprequest from reaching the dhcp server ? tcpdump version 3.8.3 isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.2_7 FreeBSD lizard 5.4-RC2 FreeBSD 5.4-RC2 best regards Thoma