On 26/09/2017 10:35 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello,
trying to build a FreeBSD based router/PBX (Asterisk 13) appliance, I ran into
several problems. My questions might have a "noobish" character, so my apology,
my experiences with IPFW are not as thorough as they should be.
...
The FreeBSD sys
On 02/09/2017 20:46, Ian Smith wrote:
On Sat, 2 Sep 2017 11:44:51 +1000, Graham Menhennitt wrote:
> I have a problem that seems to be a difference between ipfw/NAT
> behaviour in 10-Stable versus 11-Stable. I have two servers: one running
> 10-Stable and one running 11-Stable.
I have a problem that seems to be a difference between ipfw/NAT
behaviour in 10-Stable versus 11-Stable. I have two servers: one running
10-Stable and one running 11-Stable. I'm using the same rule set on both
(see below). It works correctly on 10-Stable but not on 11.
The problem is seen on t
On 31/08/2017 22:27, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 31.08.2017 15:10, Graham Menhennitt wrote:
On 10-Stable, the interface is re1. The output of 'ifconfig re1 | grep
options' is:
options=8209b
nd6 options=29
On 11-Stable (the one with the problems), it's igb1 and the outp
On 31/08/2017 20:03, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 31.08.2017 13:01, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Does anybody please have any ideas on this, please?
Can you show the output of `ifconfig igb1 | grep flags` on stable/10
and stable/11?
Sorry, I wanted to write `ifconfig igb1 | grep options`.
Thanks
I have two machines of similar CPU power that I use as routers. One is
running 11-Stable as of a week ago and the other is 10-Stable from
around the same time. They both run roughly the same IPFW rules (the
syntax has changed slightly to run on the newer version). I've been
using the 10-Stable
Hello IPFW list,
I'm running IPFW on FreeBSD 10-Stable. I thought I'd blocked any bad
things coming in from the outside world. However, I'm seeing SIP
registration attempts logged by Asterisk and I don't understand how
they're getting through. A sample log message is:
chan_sip.c: Registration
On 25/11/2015 16:00, Graham Menhennitt wrote:
> Hello IPFWers,
>
> I have a box running FreeBSD 10-stable that I use as a
> router/firewall/NAT. It runs IPFW and uses kernel NAT. My son is nagging
> me about playing multi-player online games on his Sony PS4.
>
> From what I&#x
On 28/11/2015 20:47, Thomás S. Bregolin wrote:
> Besides the redirect_port option, you still need rules allowing traffic
> in to those ports. Excuse-me if you've done that already (I have no way
> of knowing).
>
>
> Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 03:19:09PM +1100, Graham Menhennitt:
.
>
>
> Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 04:00:12PM +1100, Graham Menhennitt:
>> Hello IPFWers,
>>
>> I have a box running FreeBSD 10-stable that I use as a
>> router/firewall/NAT. It runs IPFW and uses kernel NAT. My son is nagging
>> me about playing multi-player online
Hello IPFWers,
I have a box running FreeBSD 10-stable that I use as a
router/firewall/NAT. It runs IPFW and uses kernel NAT. My son is nagging
me about playing multi-player online games on his Sony PS4.
>From what I've read, I could enable UPnP. But I've tried compiling the
net/miniupnpd port but
11 matches
Mail list logo
