The following reply was made to PR kern/182355; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gleb Smirnoff
To: Cy Schubert
Cc: Jack Seredyniecki , c...@freebsd.org,
bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/182355
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 00:49:13 +0400
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 01:39:30PM -0700, Cy
The following reply was made to PR kern/182355; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gleb Smirnoff
To: Jack Seredyniecki
Cc: c...@freebsd.org, bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/182355
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 21:08:32 +0400
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:00:49PM -0400, Jack Seredyniecki wrote
The following reply was made to PR kern/182355; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gleb Smirnoff
To: Jack Seredyniecki
Cc: c...@freebsd.org, bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/182355
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:29:29 +0400
Jack,
can you please provide your build environment? The
Spil,
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 09:06:35AM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
S> There seems to be quite a bit of overhaul on the firewall code, pf and
S> ipfw have been moved to sys/netpfil? Can there be some regressions in
S> there that I hit?
Yes, a regression is possible there. However, the issue seems t
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:48:18AM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
A> On 10.06.2012 18:20, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
A> > On 27.04.2012 03:44, Hiroki Sato wrote:
A> >> "Alexander V. Chernikov" wrote
A> >> in<4f96e71b.9020...@freebsd.org>:
A> >>
A> >> me> On 24.04.2012 21:05, Hiroki Sato wr
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:30:51AM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
A> On 14.11.2012 19:47, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
A> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:28:23PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
A> > A> So, we can do the following:
A> > A> 1) lock increments/decrement
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:28:23PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
A> So, we can do the following:
A> 1) lock increments/decrements via some separate mutex
A> 2) do nothing
A> 3) take some combined approach:
4) Take it via uma_zone_getcur(ipfw_dyn_rule_zone);
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
__
The following reply was made to PR kern/157239; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gleb Smirnoff
To: Jan Bramkamp
Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/157239: ipfw + dummynet corrupts ipv6 packets
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 17:41:54 +0400
I can't reproduce this problem
The following reply was made to PR kern/143653; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gleb Smirnoff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc: Jeff Kletsky ,
"Alexander V. Chernikov"
Subject: kern/143653
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:59:07 +0400
--J/dobhs11T7y2rNN
Content-Type: text/plai
The following reply was made to PR kern/156180; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gleb Smirnoff
To: Karim Fodil-Lemelin
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/156180
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 20:59:22 +0400
Hi, Karim!
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:36:46AM -0400, Karim Fodil-Lemelin
The following reply was made to PR kern/156180; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gleb Smirnoff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc: a...@freebsd.org
Subject: kern/156180
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 01:07:29 +0400
--5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
The following reply was made to PR kern/148418; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gleb Smirnoff
To: Dmitriy <_dmit...@mail.ru>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/148418: IPFW error
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 11:49:26 +0400
Dmitriy,
please try this patch and report w
The following reply was made to PR bin/102422; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Stephen E. Halpin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Oleg Bulyzhin <[EMAIL
Synopsis: [patch] System panic when i use uid/gid ipfw rules.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-ipfw
Responsible-Changed-By: glebius
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Feb 2 12:28:26 UTC 2006
Responsible-Changed-Why:
For ipfw list review.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=92
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:02:01PM +0900, Ganbold wrote:
G> I also tried to create graph like following way:
G>
G> ngctl mkpeer xl1: tee lower left
G> ngctl connect xl1: xl1:lower upper right
G> ngctl mkpeer xl1:lower one2many left2right many0
G> ngctl connect xl1:lower.left2right xl1:lower many1
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:55:09PM +0900, Ganbold wrote:
G> Thanks for reply. However as long as I run ngctl commands to create the
G> graph in order to catch both outgoing and incoming
G> traffic ipfw started work abnormally. Basically all my customers complained
G> that they couldn't connect to
Collegues,
Can you please look at this PR? I see the suggested fix acceptable for now and
for ABI frozen RELENG_5 branch.
Speaking of HEAD and future RELENG_6, I'd prefer to move the code that
searches
for PACKET_TAG_DIVERT up to ip_fw_pfil.c, like we do it for dummynet and ng_ipfw
returne
17 matches
Mail list logo
