Re: dummynet performance

Thanks! On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 8:29 PM Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 2:18 AM Özkan KIRIK wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I wonder if it is possible to update dummynet code multi-threading > capable > > practically? > > My idea is below: >

Re: dummynet performance

and it should call the right schedulers enqueue function that runs different thread? cheers Ozkan On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 12:43 PM Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 2:18 AM Özkan KIRIK wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I wonder if it is possible to updat

dummynet performance

Hello, I wonder if it is possible to update dummynet code multi-threading capable practically? My idea is below: - A new sysctl tunable will be defined as "net.inet.ip.dummynet.thread_count" (default 1) - To distribute tasks along threads, each sched instance can be assigned to different thread. -

Re: ipfw table add problem

Hi, I tested patch. This patch solves, ipfw table 1 add 4899 But, ipfw table 1 add 10.2.3.01 works incorrectly. output is below. # ./ipfw table 1 flush # ./ipfw table 1 add 10.2.3.01 # ./ipfw table 1 list 0.0.0.10/32 0 On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > -BE

Re: ipfw table add problem

Hi, # ipfw -i table 1 list ::/0 0.0.0.0 On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 20.11.2013 02:55, Özkan KIRIK wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm using kernel FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 #2 r257635 kernel. > > I am trying to add port number to ipf

Re: ipfw table add problem

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Özkan KIRIK wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Andreas Nilsson wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >

Re: ipfw table add problem

jail} N Search an entry in lookup table N that matches the field speci- fied as argument. If not found, the match fails. Otherwise, the match succeeds and tablearg is set to the value extracted from the table. On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Özkan KIRIK wrote: > Hi,

Re: ipfw table add problem

Hi, On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Özkan KIRIK wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm using kernel FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 #2 r257635 kernel. >> I am trying to add port number to ipfw tables. But t

ipfw table add problem

Hi, I'm using kernel FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 #2 r257635 kernel. I am trying to add port number to ipfw tables. But there is something strange : Problem is easily repeatable. #ipfw table 1 flush #ipfw table 1 add 4899 #ipfw table 1 list ::/0 0 #ipfw table 1 flush #ipfw table 1 add 10.2.3.01 ( no

Re: Limit Session Bandwidth

I think there is a mistake at the sched config line. it should be as ipfw sched 789 config mask all pipe 456 On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > ipfw sched 789 config mask all pipe 123 ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http:/

Re: ipfw: Opcode 10 size 49 wrong

.host.header_redir_missed: 0 I show that interrupt rates of queues are different. On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Özkan KIRIK wrote: > Hi, > > I am using FreeBSD 8.3 - RELEASE with ipfw + dummynet + inkernel_nat > compiled kernel. > > This message appears on my console about 20 times p

ipfw: Opcode 10 size 49 wrong

Hi, I am using FreeBSD 8.3 - RELEASE with ipfw + dummynet + inkernel_nat compiled kernel. This message appears on my console about 20 times per hour : ipfw: opcode 10 size 49 wrong" ipfw: opcode 10 size 49 wrong" ipfw: opcode 10 size 49 wrong" ipfw: opcode 10 size 49 wrong" ipfw: opcode 10 size

About IPFW in-kernel NAT nat loopback

Hi, I wanna share my experiences about ipfw in-kernel nat problems with you. When a packet injects into ipfw in-kernel nat more then once, operating systems behave abnormally. Let's inspect the ruleset below: ipfw table 12 add 10.0.14.1/32 33 ipfw table 13 add X.Y.128.30/32 33 ipfw nat 33 confi

Re: All in one machine running w/ Dansguardian+Squid+IPFW

you can forward packets directly to squid by: ipfw add fwd 127.0.0.1, tcp from not me to any dst-port 80 Ozkan KIRIK Mersin University @ Turkey On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 9/8/10 4:44 PM, Tony wrote: >> >> my setup looks like this >> >> PC1 ->  browser ->  f

Default router changes unexpectedly when dummynet enabled

Hi, When I enable dummynet rules, default router changes unexpectedly. If the pipe & queue rules not exists, there is no problem. I tried all FreeBSD 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 8.1-STABLE-201008 releases ( both i386 and amd64 ). All this FreeBSD versions are affected. I inspected logs if someone logged in or

Re: in-kernel nat and stateful inspection hangs system 7.1 RELEASE

might be helpful. > > Özkan KIRIK wrote: > > i am using FreeBSD 7.1 RELEASE as gateway (about 2000 clients 90vlans > via > > if_vlan) . > > My Server is HP DL380 G4. I am using the on board gigabit nic as wan > > interface which uses bge driver. > > > >

in-kernel nat and stateful inspection hangs system 7.1 RELEASE

Hi, i am using FreeBSD 7.1 RELEASE as gateway (about 2000 clients 90vlans via if_vlan) . My Server is HP DL380 G4. I am using the on board gigabit nic as wan interface which uses bge driver. My rule set is below: wan_intf="bge1" ipfw nat 100 config ip X.X.X.1 reset same_ports ipfw nat 101 config

tablearg support for in_kernel nat?

Hi all, I'm trying to use tablearg option for in kernel nat. But ipfw doesnt understand "tablearg" keyword. For example: # ipfw add 100 nat tablearg all from "table(10)" to any via fxp0 100 nat 0 ip from table(10) to any via fxp0 Man page says that: "The tablearg argument can be used with the f

if_bridge & ipfw divert / fwd support at FreeBSD 6.2 ?

Hello, Does anybody have an idea about if ipfw fwd/divert/dummynet works with if_bridge on a FreeBSD 6.2 machine? Is there a patch for this? Luigi wrote a patch for 4.x, does it work under 6.2 ? With best regards, Ozkan KIRIK Mersin Universty ___ fr

Re: [PATCH] ng_tag - new netgraph node, please test (L7 filtering possibility)

Try to load kernel object file kldload ./ng_tag.ko Ozkan KIRIK Joao Barros yazmış: On 6/11/06, Vadim Goncharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 11.06.06 @ 22:36 Joao Barros wrote: Original message is at: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2006-June/063821.html > I'm very interes

FreeBSD 6.0 - ipfw fwd with bridge mode

Hi, i am trying to forward packets via ipfw in bridge mode. is there any patch for 6.0-Release? thanks for your interests, ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to