On 8/3/15 10:50 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
03.08.2015, 17:14, "Ian Smith" :
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:38:18 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> my reading of the code I can see that 'ipfw delete 100-300' doesn't
> work (well I know it doesn't work, but I had thought it was a bug),
> Now I s
On 8/3/15 5:38 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
my reading of the code I can see that 'ipfw delete 100-300' doesn't
work (well I know it doesn't work, but I had thought it was a bug),
Now I see that its just 'not supported'
It may be my imagination but (distant) past?
somehow this got truncated..
it
03.08.2015, 17:14, "Ian Smith" :
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:38:18 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > my reading of the code I can see that 'ipfw delete 100-300' doesn't
> > work (well I know it doesn't work, but I had thought it was a bug),
> > Now I see that its just 'not supported'
I implemented t
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:38:18 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> my reading of the code I can see that 'ipfw delete 100-300' doesn't
> work (well I know it doesn't work, but I had thought it was a bug),
> Now I see that its just 'not supported'
>
> It may be my imagination but (distant) past?
I w
my reading of the code I can see that 'ipfw delete 100-300' doesn't
work (well I know it doesn't work, but I had thought it was a bug),
Now I see that its just 'not supported'
It may be my imagination but (distant) past?
___
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org ma
