Re: FreeBSD max pipe size?

2014-10-13 Thread Michael Sierchio
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Michael Sierchio wrote: > ipfw add pipe 10 from any to any in recv $ext_if > ipfw add pipe 20 from any to any out xmit $ext_if Obviously a scrivener's error, and meant ipfw add pipe 10 ip from any to any in recv $ext_if ipfw add pipe 20 ip from any to any out xm

Re: FreeBSD max pipe size?

2014-10-13 Thread Michael Sierchio
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Jack Barber wrote: > I am trying to set up dummynet with FreeBSD 9.3 and a 10 GB Fibre over > ethernet NIC (ix drivers). > > Dummynet appears to have a limit of 1.25 gigabits a second, and when I > start setting extremely large pipe values I start running into: >

FreeBSD max pipe size?

2014-10-13 Thread Jack Barber
I am trying to set up dummynet with FreeBSD 9.3 and a 10 GB Fibre over ethernet NIC (ix drivers). Dummynet appears to have a limit of 1.25 gigabits a second, and when I start setting extremely large pipe values I start running into: ipfw: bandwidth too large It doesn't like(in /etc/ipfw.rules)

Re: net.inet{,6}.fw.enable in /etc/rc

2014-10-13 Thread Hiroki Sato
Ian Smith wrote in <20141013202423.j56...@sola.nimnet.asn.au>: sm> Anyway, looking at rcorder /etc/rc.d/* there are quite a few possible sm> interdependencies to explore before considering moving ipfw, including sm> its relationship to pf - some people do use both - and perhaps routing, sm> bri

Re: net.inet{,6}.fw.enable in /etc/rc

2014-10-13 Thread Ian Smith
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 05:02:11 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Ian Smith wrote > in <20141003025830.d48...@sola.nimnet.asn.au>: > > sm> which rules will be flushed when /etc/rc.d/ipfw runs, but should enable > sm> DHCP to work? I'm not sure whether those rules are exactly correct or > sm> suff