I got it,
if the HZ=3, it always cannot meet the " 1 packet per 500ms" perfectly.
But if we to "X packet per Y ticks", actually the result is the same, still
cannot meet the "1 packet per 500 ms" perfectly, instead, the "packet per Y
ticks" will force user to use " X packet per Y*300 ms". An
The following reply was made to PR kern/189720; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: 'Luigi Rizzo'
To: bycn82
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/189720: [ipfw] [patch] pps action for ipfw
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 17:17:59 +0200
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:06:27PM +0800, bycn82 wrote:
>
The following reply was made to PR kern/189720; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "bycn82"
To: "'Luigi Rizzo'" ,
Cc:
Subject: RE: kern/189720: [ipfw] [patch] pps action for ipfw
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 23:06:27 +0800
-Original Message-
From: Luigi Rizzo [mailto:ri...@iet.unip
The following reply was made to PR kern/189720; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Luigi Rizzo
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, byc...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: kern/189720: [ipfw] [patch] pps action for ipfw
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 16:12:16 +0200
Hi,
I have looked at the update from May 13th but it
