Hi
According to the `loop` in the chk() function, everytime it was invoked,
the arg will be checked against `the chain`, so I assumed that the same is
always the same,
I saw that, `the chain` is always `V_layer3_chain`, but I did not find any
V_layer2_chain !!!
So I assumed that currently i
Cool!
I just finished the overview of the source code,and finally understood the
`for loop` in the ip_fw2.c roughly,
beside of the coding style,sorry for my ironic words, I want to ask
whether my understanding is correct.
you wrap the packet/frame in the `check frame` or `check packet` which
tks for ur testing, u r right, that s the reason y i said the `in` option
is not functioning properly.
and who is the guy maintains the source of ipfw. two things i want to said
to him,
1. the source of ipfw is cool,amazingly powerful, by reading the source
code, it found actually it checked
Synopsis: [ipfw] ipfw option `in` is not working on FreeBSD10
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ipfw->ae
Responsible-Changed-By: ae
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Apr 16 14:19:42 UTC 2014
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Take it.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=188543
__
The following reply was made to PR kern/188543; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: lhmwzy
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, byc...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/188543: [ipfw] ipfw option `in` is not working on FreeBSD10
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:12:42 +0800
--001a11c12c1af3685704f728aba7
Conte
thanks for commenting, for testing
i started to read the source code this morning when i was in the mrt.
i was a java developer and the source code for i have to said "what a
mess!"
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:40:00 +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
The following reply was made to PR kern/188543; it has been
