I suspected that that was what's happening, but it wasn't obvious. Thanks for
clarifying!
Lars
On Mar 14, 2013, at 10:29, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> On 14.03.2013 17:56, Eggert, Lars wrote:
>> Hi,
> Hello.
>>
>> interpreting these bits as a TOS field has been deprecated since RFC2474 was
On 14.03.2013 17:56, Eggert, Lars wrote:
Hi,
Hello.
interpreting these bits as a TOS field has been deprecated since RFC2474 was
published in 1998. Since then, we've been having a DSCP codepoint and ECN bits
in the IP header.
Yes. I'm going to commit DSCP-based approach, so I'm grabbing all
2013/3/14 Alexander V. Chernikov
> Hello list!
>
> This is the obvious thing which should be done at least 5 years ago.
> There are several PRs like kern/102471 and kern/121122 with similar
> functionality.
>
> Given patch adds setting DSCP support (O_SETDSCP) which works for both
> IPv4 and IPv6
Hi,
interpreting these bits as a TOS field has been deprecated since RFC2474 was
published in 1998. Since then, we've been having a DSCP codepoint and ECN bits
in the IP header.
It would be actively harmful to add TOS byte support 15 years after it was
deprecated. Read http://en.wikipedia.org/
Synopsis: [ipfw] [patch] add support to ToS IP PRECEDENCE fields
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ipfw->melifaro
Responsible-Changed-By: melifaro
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Mar 14 13:48:37 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Take.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=121122
__
Hello list!
This is the obvious thing which should be done at least 5 years ago.
There are several PRs like kern/102471 and kern/121122 with similar
functionality.
Given patch adds setting DSCP support (O_SETDSCP) which works for both
IPv4 and IPv6 packets. Fast checksum recalculation (RFC 1624)
