> At the moment maximum number of tables remains the same however it is
> now possible to define IPFW_TABLES_MAX to 65k without much (memory)
> overhead. Since pointer to tables are stored in array, defining 2^32
> tables require 4G * (8+8+1) memory for pointers only.
65k is also a good amount.
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:55:22PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> > On 25. Dec 2011, at 17:47 , Pawel Tyll wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Alexander,
> >>
> >>> Changes:
> >>> * Tables (actually, radix trees) are now created/freed on demand.
> >> Does this mean IPFW_TABLES_MA
On 25. Dec 2011, at 18:55 , Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> On 25. Dec 2011, at 17:47 , Pawel Tyll wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Alexander,
>>>
Changes:
* Tables (actually, radix trees) are now created/freed on demand.
>>> Does this mean IPFW_TABLES_MAX can now be safely
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 25. Dec 2011, at 17:47 , Pawel Tyll wrote:
>
>> Hi Alexander,
>>
>>> Changes:
>>> * Tables (actually, radix trees) are now created/freed on demand.
>> Does this mean IPFW_TABLES_MAX can now be safely set to arbitrarily
>> high number that would allow flexible numberin
On 25. Dec 2011, at 17:47 , Pawel Tyll wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
>> Changes:
>> * Tables (actually, radix trees) are now created/freed on demand.
> Does this mean IPFW_TABLES_MAX can now be safely set to arbitrarily
> high number that would allow flexible numbering of tables? Arbitrarily
> hig
Hi Alexander,
> Changes:
> * Tables (actually, radix trees) are now created/freed on demand.
Does this mean IPFW_TABLES_MAX can now be safely set to arbitrarily
high number that would allow flexible numbering of tables? Arbitrarily
high being 0x or some other nice large number that won
On 25. Dec 2011, at 14:59 , Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> Final patch version now uses single IP_FW3 socket option.
> Together with other changes this makes me think such changes should be
> reviewed by a wider number of people. If there are no
> objections/comments I plan
Hello everyone.
Final patch version now uses single IP_FW3 socket option.
Together with other changes this makes me think such changes should be
reviewed by a wider number of people. If there are no
objections/comments I plan to commit this on tuesday.
Changes:
* Tables (actually, radix trees) ar
