Re: Request for policy decision: kernel nat vs/and/or natd

2011-01-15 Thread Ian Smith
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Ian Smith wrote > in <20110108220300.q15...@sola.nimnet.asn.au>: > > sm> On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 15:02:29 +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > sm> > On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Brandon Gooch wrote: > sm> > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Ian Smith > wrote: > sm

Re: conf/148144: [patch] add ipfw_nat support for rc.firewall simple type

2011-01-15 Thread hrs
Synopsis: [patch] add ipfw_nat support for rc.firewall simple type Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ipfw->hrs Responsible-Changed-By: hrs Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Jan 15 16:15:57 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll take this. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=148144

Re: conf/148137: [ipfw] call order of natd and ipfw startup scripts

2011-01-15 Thread hrs
Synopsis: [ipfw] call order of natd and ipfw startup scripts Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ipfw->hrs Responsible-Changed-By: hrs Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Jan 15 16:15:20 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll take this. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=148137 __

Re: Request for policy decision: kernel nat vs/and/or natd

2011-01-15 Thread Hiroki Sato
Ian Smith wrote in <20110108220300.q15...@sola.nimnet.asn.au>: sm> On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 15:02:29 +1100, Ian Smith wrote: sm> > On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Brandon Gooch wrote: sm> > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Ian Smith wrote: sm> [..] sm> > > > We could: sm> > > > sm> > > > 1) Preferen