Re: help regarding writing pseudo-drivers in FreeBSD

2001-05-10 Thread julien
Hi, Have a look at http://www.daemonnews.org/200010/blueprints.html , i think it's a good starting point, with an example of an "echo" pseudo device driver. You could also look at /usr/src/sys/net/if_tun* (tunneling pseudo device) for a more real life example. Hope this helps -- -

mylex raid card problem on 4.2-stable

2001-05-22 Thread julien
Hi all, We have a quite disapointing problem with a mylex 170 card, which causes a system crash every 6 hours. This card is installed in a VA Linux 2240 with 4 18GB drives, configured in a single RAID 5 pack, running a FreeBSD 4.2-stable system. We have to notice that this system ran during 4 mon

Re: mylex raid card problem on 4.2-stable

2001-05-22 Thread julien
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]--- - Original Message - From: "Lawrence Sica`" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "julien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "cristophe baillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent:

Re: technical comparison

2001-05-23 Thread julien
Hi all, I tried your tests on a quite different configuration, a PIII 800 with 1GB ram, with an AcceleRAID 170 controller and a single RAID5 pack of 4*8GB IBM SCSI drives. The system is a 4.3-rc2, NO softupdates, default configuration. Here are the results : pm>set transactions 1 pm>set numb

Re: mylex raid card problem on 4.2-stable

2001-05-31 Thread julien
, the problem is better "known" when you are the author of the driver isn't it ? ;-)) thanx again -- --- --> [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- - Original Message - From: "Mike Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> T

Re: txt-sysinstall scrapped

2010-11-07 Thread Julien Laffaye
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Joel Dahl wrote: > On 07-11-2010 11:40, Daniel Gerzo wrote: >> On 6.11.2010 6:17, Josh Paetzel wrote: >> > Without putting much analysis into it, we talked about using lighttpd, >> > which >> > is BSDL.  As far as another service, it would be running for the insta

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-25 Thread Julien Laffaye
mp so user can periodically backup their database. > > It needs to be automated. Maybe periodic daily... but maybe this is not > often enough after a day of a lot of changes (think about it this way: do > you want to lose a day of changes?). The current FS based DB is very robust, >

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-26 Thread Julien Laffaye
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >  Developpement site: http://git.etoilebsd.net/pkgng/ FYI, we moved to github[1] in order to have a bug tracker, pull request and code review. Also, I recommend to build from the HEAD of the git repository, to not report fixed compilati

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-28 Thread Julien Laffaye
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 25/03/2011 12:11 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> miwi@ launched the new thing called Experimental Call For Testing,

Re: [ECFT] pkgng 0.1-alpha1: a replacement for pkg_install

2011-03-29 Thread Julien Laffaye
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote: > II. Package signing. That would be really nice. >>> >>> Right know we only planned to sign the repo database, so we can trust >>> the sah256 of the packages stored in the database. Then if the package >>> has the same sha256 as t

Re: [RFC] rcexecr: rcorder in parallel

2011-06-04 Thread Julien Laffaye
welcome. Hello, Thanks for doing that! You should use kqueue(2) instead of waitpid(2) so that you can efficiently monitor a pool of processes. See pwait(1) for an example. Regards, Julien ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.

[CFT] pkgng alpha2

2011-11-30 Thread Julien Laffaye
bapt's presentation from BSDCan [4], EuroBSDCon [5] [6] and browse the source code. Regards, Julien, on behalf of the pkgng team. And remember, we _do_ want to hear back from you! Please also note that it is still alpha code and it can kill kitten and puppies. You are warned ;-) [1] : https://g

GSoC:Complete Package support in the pkg_install tools and cleanup

2010-05-03 Thread Julien Laffaye
the pkg_install tools. My page on the wiki is http://wiki.freebsd.org/SOC2010JulienLaffaye You can email me on or off list is you have any questions, comments or suggestions. Best regards, Julien Laffaye ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org ma

Re: GSoC:Complete Package support in the pkg_install tools and cleanup

2010-05-04 Thread Julien Laffaye
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Andrew Brampton wrote: > > Hi Julien, > > Glad you got onto the GSoC programme. I'm curious, what benefit is a > complete package over many individual ones? Hi Andrew, If you cant or dont want to use the remote feature of of pkg_add (ex. you

Re: GSoC:Complete Package support in the pkg_install tools and cleanup

2010-05-05 Thread Julien Laffaye
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:30:13AM -0700, Julien Laffaye wrote: >> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Andrew Brampton >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Julien, >> > >> > Glad you got onto the GSoC prog

Re: SoC2009: libpkg, pkg tools rewrite

2009-04-26 Thread Julien Laffaye
the run time dependencies). So basically, an API which understand "give me all the packages names you have in the INDEX", "give me the description for _this_ package", "give me all the names plus the categories", "give me..." Regards, Julien Laffaye ___

Re:Star & FreeBSD.

2005-02-11 Thread Julien Gabel
>> Is the CDDL license compatible with the BSD and MIT licenses? > According to the OpenBSD-folks: NO > See yesterdays thread on openbsd-tech. There is a similar thread on netbsd-advocacy@ mailing list too. -- -jpeg. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org m

Re: NIC detected, but won't DHCP or configure.

2005-03-22 Thread Julien Gabel
>> thanks for the suggestion! I tried that and it didn't seem to change >> anything: the relevant output of pciconf -lv is still >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3:0: class=0x02 card=0x09001558 chip=0x816910ec rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' >> device = 'RTL8169 Gigabit

Re: NIC detected, but won't DHCP or configure.

2005-03-22 Thread Julien Gabel
thanks for the suggestion! I tried that and it didn't seem to change anything: the relevant output of pciconf -lv is still [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3:0: class=0x02 card=0x09001558 chip=0x816910ec rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' device = 'R

NIC detected, but won't DHCP or configure.

2005-03-23 Thread Julien Gabel
>>> Interestingly, i encountered the very same behaviour as explained by >>> Andrew, with a side note: it works sometimes for me. Despite the fact >>> that my ethernet seems correctly handled (ifconfig shows the 're' >>> entry), almost all the time i boot on my notebook (D480V) the state of >>> th

Re: req: New feature to rm? Remove file by the inode number

2005-05-05 Thread Julien Gabel
>> I couldn't find a way to remove files that had scandic/non-printable >> letters, then i remembered ls showed inode number of the file. Is it >> possible to remove the file by the inode number? It would be a >> useful feature :) >> >> I bet there is a way to remove those files, but only >> third

Re: req: New feature to rm? Remove file by the inode number

2005-05-05 Thread Julien Gabel
>> Point 2, likely as not, might explain why there's no >> simple mechanism for doing this from rm. At the very >> least you'd have to specify the file system you're >> referring to, and many "plain" users couldn't do >> that safely. Those that can are probably able to use >> find anyway. > A (dev

Re: Realtek RTL8169 on FreeBSD 5.4: no carrier.

2005-08-10 Thread Julien Gabel
> I recently installed FreeBSD 5.4 on an ABIT AA-8 DuraMax and all went > well. All hardware detected properly and everything was running great, > until I got to configuring my network. ifconfig shows my onboard > gigabit LAN as "status: no carrier" > > I can successfully ping localhost and the I

Re: Realtek RTL8169 on FreeBSD 5.4: no carrier.

2005-08-10 Thread Julien Gabel
>> Regrettably, i always encountered this problem. I spoke about that >> since the middle of 2004, and didn't really receive feedback on this. >> I try a lot of things but none worked better than the other. >> >> To not forget about it, i filled a bug report on this particular >> problem, see PR k

Re: Realtek RTL8100S on FreeBSD 5.4: no carrier.

2005-08-10 Thread Julien Gabel
Regrettably, i always encountered this problem. I spoke about that >>> since the middle of 2004, and didn't really receive feedback on this. >>> I try a lot of things but none worked better than the other. >>> >>> To not forget about it, i filled a bug report on this particular >>> problem, s

Re: Realtek RTL8169 on FreeBSD 5.4: no carrier.

2005-08-21 Thread Julien Gabel
Regrettably, i always encountered this problem. I spoke about that since the middle of 2004, and didn't really receive feedback on this. I try a lot of things but none worked better than the other. To not forget about it, i filled a bug report on this particular probl

Re: Realtek RTL8169 on FreeBSD 5.4: no carrier.

2005-08-21 Thread Julien Gabel
> Regrettably, i always encountered this problem. I spoke about that > since the middle of 2004, and didn't really receive feedback on this. > I try a lot of things but none worked better than the other. > > To not forget about it, i filled a bug report on this particular >

Re: What RFCs are supported by FreeBSD

2003-06-02 Thread Julien Bournelle
> Well, right now I was trying to understand if RFC2003 (IP-ENCAP) is > supported. IP-Encapsulation is supported by using gif interface. -- julien.bournelle at int-evry.fr ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr

toggling promiscuous mode logging on NICs

2002-08-28 Thread Julien Benoist
anyway. -- Julien Benoist --- /usr/src.old/sys/net/if.c Sun Apr 28 07:40:25 2002 +++ /usr/src/sys/net/if.c Thu Aug 29 03:52:06 2002 @@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ static void if_slowtimo __P((void *)); static void link_rtrequest __P((int, struct rtentry *, struct rt_addrinfo *)); static int if_rtdel __P

sio i/o

2002-11-07 Thread Julien Mabillard
hi, can anyone tell me where inb(), outb() are defined in the sources (FreeBSD RELENG_4_7 or CURRENT)? on linux systems this is defined in thank you. Key fingerprint = D34A 577C 869B 28A2 3886 4298 50CB DC18 31A4 ACAD

Re: sio i/o

2002-11-07 Thread Julien Mabillard
great, thanks :-) On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 09:33:29AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 07-Nov-2002 Julien Mabillard wrote: > > hi, > > can anyone tell me where inb(), outb() are defined > > in the sources (FreeBSD RELENG_4_7 or CURRENT)? > > on linux systems this i

Re: sio i/o

2002-11-07 Thread Julien Mabillard
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > > On 07-Nov-2002 Julien Mabillard wrote: > > > hi, > > > can anyone tell me where inb(), outb() are defined > > > in the sources (FreeBSD RELENG_4_7 or CURRENT)? > > > on linux syst

5.0-DP2 sparc64 buildworld problem

2003-01-09 Thread Julien Bournelle
Hi all, I try to compile a kernel for a sparc64 on my FreeBSD 4.5 box. So I cvsup with: " *default host=ftp.fr.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete use-rel-suffix # If your network link is a T1 or faster, comment out the following line.