Re: Laptop suggestions?

ing a iwi miniPCI -- namely 4965 and the like there IS a driver for it and it currently is in -CURRENT -- you can also patch this to 7.0 with the perforce code -- both of those should be readily available on the freebsd page wiki -- i would recommend tracking current if i were on a laptop since more thi

256-byte inode support

erested in this) -- thanks and hope everyone is well respectfully, /jT ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: 256-byte inode support

_data + EXT2_INODE_SIZE(fs) * ino_to_fsbo(fs, ino)), ip); ip->i_block_group = ino_to_cg(fs, ino); ip->i_next_alloc_block = 0; /jT http://git.zen-sources.org/?p=kernel/zenmm.git;a=summary On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: process hibernation and process descriptor table

> Any suggestions about how i should go about the project. > > > > Aniket Pansare > ___ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to &

Re: Intel 5100 WiFi

eedom -- hence FreeBSD -- again not sure what the OBSD policies are. In addition this is probably a better question for freebsd-mobile or freebsd-questions Thanks and good luck -- /jT http://git.zen-sources.org/?p=kernel/zenmm.git;a=summary ___ freebsd-ha

Re: Intel 5100 WiFi

. > > Sam > > -- /jT http://git.zen-sources.org/?p=kernel/zenmm.git;a=summary ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: keeping track of local modifications

personally prefer Hg and Git to SVN. Thank you to all who have contributed to this conversation it has been extremely informative for me and i'm sure several others. I hope everyone is looking forward to the holidays Respectfully, -- /jT http://git.zen-sources.org/?p=kernel/zenmm.g

concurrent sysctl implementation

ding to get the job done correctly. I'm also open to implementing other things once this is done. I hope everyone is doing well. respectfully, =jt ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ha

Re: concurrent sysctl implementation

Ed, Thanks :) I'll be implementing this as discussed over the next few months thanks for the technical detail I've been extremely busy with finals. I will write the list with my thoughts within the next week, sorry for the delay. =jt On May 8, 2009, at 17:41, Ed Schouten w

Re: concurrent sysctl implementation

ot;queue" or list? Instead perhaps break them up into several lists or, more fundamentally, two lists -- those that are dynamically created entries and those that are not -- is this even feasible to distinguish between the two originally and then on the fly later? Thanks a lot! Respectfully