Myson drivers for 4.x

2002-02-25 Thread dirkx
I found: http://www.myson.com.tw/mtd/driver/803/mtd80x-freebsd.tgz.TGZ to work splendidly with 4.5. Would be nice to see them rolled in. Dw To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Myson drivers for 4.x

2002-02-25 Thread dirkx
Hmm - must be transient - it works for me at this time (on 210.103.175.103). Dw. On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > www.myson.com.tw: Unable to reolve. > > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > I found: > > > > http://www.myson.com.tw/mtd/driver/803/mtd80x-fre

Re: Myson drivers for 4.x

2002-02-26 Thread dirkx
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > did you say that there are other cards apparently OEM'd from these? Yes - Saturday I bought a handfull of: Sitecom PCI Expansion kit's Trust PCI Ethernet NIC Vendex PCI Ethernet NIC 10/100 cards which have, on the box, a ma

Re: Myson drivers for 4.x

2002-02-26 Thread dirkx
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > just curious, what if you add the pci-id in the list of > devices reognised by if_rl.c (how different are the two drivers) ? I tried that first :-) - added an entry to the list 'My RealTek..' and got: rl0: port 0xe000-0xe0ff mem

Re: Myson drivers for 4.x

2002-02-26 Thread dirkx
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > Is it possible that by adding the correct PCI ID teh realtek driver might > handle them? No: I tried that first: rl0: port 0xe000-0xe0ff mem 0xdf00-0xdf0003ff irq 11 at device 11.0 on pci0 rl0: Ethernet address

Re: Userland Hacker Task: divert socket listener...

2002-03-12 Thread dirkx
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Here is something I miss a lot: > > I would like a small program which can listen to a specified divert(4) > socket and act on the incoming packets. > > Specifically I want to direct all unwanted trafic from my ipfw rules > into the divert socket a

Re: GPS time.

2002-03-29 Thread dirkx
> I just connected my gps (garmin gps III plus) to my serial port > and realized that simply cat'ing cua0 displays date/time/position of the > unit. (neato). Anyway, how accurate would it be to use the time from this > output for ntp as opposed to my current setup using ntp servers. I beli

Myson / if_my.c for FreeBSD

2002-04-15 Thread dirkx
hanks ! Dw. -- Dirk-Willem van Gulik / dirkx(a)apache.org diff -c3 freebsd/freebsd5/if_my.c /sys/pci/if_my.c FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #11 *** if_my.c Mon Apr 15 17:12:02 2002 --- /sys/pci/if_my.cMon Apr 15 17:10:03 2002 *** *** 1004,1010 static int my_attach(dev) d

Re: Myson / if_my.c for FreeBSD

2002-04-15 Thread dirkx
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > did you check the driver checked into the -current tree? > I did most of this plus a bit more, > Includind adding the right copyright, and reformatting it into BSD > "Kernel Normal Format" (KNF). Arg!! you must have done that just after my last upda

Re: Cardreaders and touchscreens?

2002-06-10 Thread dirkx
> The cardreader is another story. I'm free in choosing one which I can get to > work. Does anyone have any experience with these things under FreeBSD? Any > brands/types from which I *really* should stay away? I've used a wide range of serial port ones; most seem OEM-ed IBMs or SEMA/Schulber

Re: freebsd<-802.11b->linux

2002-06-16 Thread dirkx
> I was just wondering if anyone else has experienced crashes due to > attempting to connect a linux box to fbsd via a wireless nic. Quite sad > actually that an ipaq can crash a fbsd or obsd box while it scans in > infrastructure mode. > > Anyone have any ideas? the only solution as

Re: sbc/embedded FreeBSD friendly

2002-06-18 Thread dirkx
The soekris.com boxes work very well for me. Dw. -- Dirk-Willem van Gulik On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Danny Braniss wrote: > for a lab course, we are looking for FreeBSD friendly boards, any suggestions > are welcome, > > thanks, > > danny > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: inuring FreeBSD to the apache bug without upgrading apache ?

2002-06-23 Thread dirkx
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Joshua Lee wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 19:59:20 -0700 > Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Patrick Thomas wrote: > > > Is it possible to patch/recompile FreeBSD 4.5 in such a way that your > > > system is no longer vulnerable to the "chunking" attack, even if yo

Re: Using FreeBSD as a base station

2002-06-27 Thread dirkx
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > there is code to do 'host-AP' mode for cards based on the Prism-II > > chip. > > > > disclamer: I have not used it. > > I have (with the Linksys WMP11) and it works well. > > ifconfig wi0 int 10.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 stationname `hostname

FSCK/current and dump errors

2002-06-29 Thread dirkx
Not sure if I should blame current - but see the errors below. I've tried an fsck and an fsck -f from single user mode on each of the affected disks (7 disk, mix of ide/scsi give this). FSCK comes through clean. Prior to running -CURRENT the disks where attached to a 2.0.8 machine; and the dump

Re: How noisy should ch(4) be ?

2002-07-03 Thread dirkx
> > > - run 'chio ielem' before you do anything. This may make the changer look > > >at what it has, and perhaps figure out that it doesn't really have a > > >source addresses for various elements. > > What about this option? It happily ran the option - but any subsequent command would

Re: How noisy should ch(4) be ?

2002-07-03 Thread dirkx
> It probably just doesn't mention the problem. Yes - you are right - as it also (turns out now) supressed the warning abotu the tape cleaning tape being in the wrong slot. Dw. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: FSCK/current and dump errors

2002-07-08 Thread dirkx
FYI: The error described below is fully fixed by moving from 1.10.2.4 to rev. 1.22 of traverse.c. It is the change from 1.21 -> 1.22 which restores the ability to do a backup again. Thanks! Dw. On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Not sure if I should blame current - but see the er

Re: dump on mounted fs

2002-07-21 Thread dirkx
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Mark W. Krentel wrote: > > Dump on a live FS is always risky. FreeBSD in 4.x and earlier will have > > up to about a 30 second delay before a write() makes it to physical disk. Is this regardless of the sync(8) command used ? And if so - what does sync(8) actually sync - a