Fix for scrambled top display on SMP [PR 22270]

2001-03-05 Thread William Carrel
It's just three lines of code. :) I have SMP machines here that have some pretty absurdly long usernames thanks to some NIS accounts (20+ chars). Unfortunately the namelength truncation code in /usr/bin/top currently doesn't take into account the 'C' (last CPU) field that SMP machines have.

Re: path_mtu_discovery

2002-01-04 Thread William Carrel
ELENG_4 systems I run spewing stuff to console if the PMTU-D was turned on. Also I wonder if the user's OpenBSD box and FreeBSD box agree on what their MTU is. In any case, barring anyone being able to repeat this it probably belongs on -questions@. -- William Carrel To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: path_mtu_discovery

2002-01-04 Thread William Carrel
On Friday, January 4, 2002, at 12:46 PM, Terry Lambert wrote: > William Carrel wrote: > >> ipfilter with 'keep state' on the connections will automatically allow >> back in relevant ICMP messages such as mustfrag. > > Heh... I need to try to write a "mu

Re: path_mtu_discovery

2002-01-04 Thread William Carrel
[reducing CC creep] On Friday, January 4, 2002, at 03:46 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote: > In a message written on Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:35:35PM -0800, Terry > Lambert wrote: >> Of course, now you've let the dirty little secret out of the >> bag: the MTU is on the *route*, which means on the next hop,

Re: path_mtu_discovery

2002-01-04 Thread William Carrel
On Friday, January 4, 2002, at 03:56 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote: > In a message written on Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 01:26:54PM -0800, William > Carrel wrote: >> See now you've made me curious, and I ask myself questions like: How >> robust is PMTU-D against someone malicious wh

Re: raidframe

2002-06-11 Thread William Carrel
etty stable, I could always submit them as a PR too, but I shudder to think of the sort of flaming that would incur. -- William Carrel | Sr. Systems Engineer | [EMAIL PROTECTED] InfoSpace INC 601 108th Ave NE | Suite 1200 | Bellevue, WA 98004 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: kern/16318: Fix for wrong interface when adding new routes

2000-02-15 Thread William Carrel
query-pr.cgi?pr=16318 I just thought I'd post this around again to draw attention to my open PR with code included, and mention that I've had successful testing reports on -current. -- William Carrel To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers

Re: kern/16318: Fix for wrong interface when adding new routes

2000-06-08 Thread William Carrel
This problem still affects the FreeBSD kernel in 4.0 and 5.0. A patch file for 4.0-STABLE follows, I've tested this on 4.0-RELEASE and 4.0-STABLE (incl. SMP for what it's worth). There is no difference between route.c at HEAD(5.0-current) and RELENG_4(4.0-stable) so this patch should work effec